Spigolon Dandara N, de Moraes Thyago P, Figueiredo Ana E, Modesto Ana Paula, Barretti Pasqual, Bastos Marcus Gomes, Barreto Daniela V, Pecoits-Filho Roberto
School of Medicine, Pontifx00ED;cia Universidade Catx00F3;lica do Paranx00E1; (PUCPR), Curitiba, Brazil.
Am J Nephrol. 2016;43(2):104-11. doi: 10.1159/000444401. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
Structured pre-dialysis care is associated with an increase in peritoneal dialysis (PD) utilization, but not with peritonitis risk, technical and patient survival. This study aimed at analyzing the impact of pre-dialysis care on these outcomes.
All incident patients starting PD between 2004 and 2011 in a Brazilian prospective cohort were included in this analysis. Patients were divided into 2 groups: early pre-dialysis care (90 days of follow-up by a nephrology team); and late pre-dialysis care (absent or less than 90 days follow-up). The socio-demographic, clinical and biochemical characteristics between the 2 groups were compared. Risk factors for the time to the first peritonitis episode, technique failure and mortality based on Cox proportional hazards models.
Four thousand one hundred seven patients were included. Patients with early pre-dialysis care presented differences in gender (female - 47.0 vs. 51.1%, p = 0.01); race (white - 63.8 vs. 71.7%, p < 0.01); education (<4 years - 61.9 vs. 71.0%, p < 0.01), respectively, compared to late care. Patients with early pre-dialysis care presented a higher prevalence of comorbidities, lower levels of creatinine, phosphorus, and glucose with a significantly better control of hemoglobin and potassium serum levels. There was no impact of pre-dialysis care on peritonitis rates (hazard ratio (HR) 0.88; 95% CI 0.77-1.01) and technique survival (HR 1.12; 95% CI 0.92-1.36). Patient survival (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.41) was better in the early pre-dialysis care group.
Earlier pre-dialysis care was associated with improved patient survival, but did not influence time to the first peritonitis nor technique survival in this national PD cohort.
结构化的透析前护理与腹膜透析(PD)利用率的增加相关,但与腹膜炎风险、技术和患者生存率无关。本研究旨在分析透析前护理对这些结果的影响。
纳入巴西前瞻性队列中2004年至2011年间开始进行PD的所有新发病例患者。患者分为两组:早期透析前护理(由肾病团队随访90天);以及晚期透析前护理(无随访或随访少于90天)。比较两组之间的社会人口统计学、临床和生化特征。基于Cox比例风险模型分析首次腹膜炎发作时间、技术失败和死亡率的危险因素。
共纳入4107例患者。与晚期护理相比,接受早期透析前护理的患者在性别(女性 - 47.0%对51.1%,p = 0.01)、种族(白人 - 63.8%对71.7%,p < 0.01)、教育程度(<4年 - 61.9%对71.0%,p < 0.01)方面存在差异。接受早期透析前护理的患者合并症患病率更高,肌酐、磷和葡萄糖水平更低,血红蛋白和血钾水平的控制明显更好。透析前护理对腹膜炎发生率(风险比(HR)0.88;95%置信区间0.77 - 1.01)和技术生存率(HR 1.12;95%置信区间0.92 - 1.36)没有影响。早期透析前护理组的患者生存率(HR 1.20;95%置信区间1.03 - 1.41)更好。
在这个全国性的PD队列中,早期透析前护理与患者生存率的提高相关,但不影响首次腹膜炎发作时间和技术生存率。