Rawlings Andreea M, Bandeen-Roche Karen, Gross Alden L, Gottesman Rebecca F, Coker Laura H, Penman Alan D, Sharrett A Richey, Mosley Thomas H
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Psychol Assess. 2016 Dec;28(12):1674-1683. doi: 10.1037/pas0000293. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
Neuropsychological test batteries are designed to assess cognition in detail by measuring cognitive performance in multiple domains. This study examines the factor structure of tests from the ARIC-NCS battery overall and across informative subgroups defined by demographic and vascular risk factors in a population of older adults. We analyzed neuropsychological test scores from 6,413 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS) examined in 2011-2013. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess the fit of an a priori hypothesized 3-domain model, and fit statistics were calculated and compared to 1- and 2-domain models. Additionally, we tested for stability (invariance) of factor structures among different subgroups defined by diabetes, hypertension, age, sex, race, and education. Mean age of participants was 76 years, 76% were White, and 60% were female. CFA on the a priori hypothesized 3-domain structure, including memory, sustained attention and processing speed, and language, fit the data better (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.973, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = 0.059) than the 2-domain (CFI = 0.960, RMSEA = 0.070) and 1-domain (CFI = 0.947, RMSEA = 0.080) models. Bayesian information criterion value was lowest, and quantile-quantile plots indicated better fit, for the 3-domain model. Additionally, multiple-group CFA supported a common structure across the tested demographic subgroups, and indicated strict invariance by diabetes and hypertension status. In this community-based population of older adults with varying levels of cognitive performance, the a priori hypothesized 3-domain structure fit the data well. The identified factors were configurally invariant by age, sex, race, and education, and strictly invariant by diabetes and hypertension status. (PsycINFO Database Record
神经心理测试组合旨在通过测量多个领域的认知表现来详细评估认知能力。本研究考察了ARIC-NCS测试组合整体的因素结构,以及在一个老年人群体中,由人口统计学和血管危险因素定义的信息丰富的亚组的因素结构。我们分析了2011年至2013年在社区动脉粥样硬化风险神经认知研究(ARIC-NCS)中6413名参与者的神经心理测试分数。采用验证性因素分析(CFA)来评估一个先验假设的三领域模型的拟合度,并计算拟合统计量,并与一领域和两领域模型进行比较。此外,我们还测试了由糖尿病、高血压、年龄、性别、种族和教育程度定义的不同亚组之间因素结构的稳定性(不变性)。参与者的平均年龄为76岁,76%为白人,60%为女性。对先验假设的三领域结构(包括记忆、持续注意力和处理速度以及语言)进行的CFA比两领域(CFI = 0.960,近似均方根误差[RMSEA] = 0.070)和一领域(CFI = 0.947,RMSEA = 0.080)模型更适合数据(比较拟合指数[CFI] = 0.973,近似均方根误差[RMSEA] = 0.059)。贝叶斯信息准则值最低,并且分位数-分位数图表明三领域模型的拟合更好。此外,多组CFA支持所测试的人口统计学亚组之间的共同结构,并表明糖尿病和高血压状态具有严格的不变性。在这个基于社区的、认知表现水平各异的老年人群体中,先验假设的三领域结构很好地拟合了数据。所确定的因素在年龄、性别、种族和教育程度方面具有构型不变性,并在糖尿病和高血压状态方面具有严格不变性。(PsycINFO数据库记录