Kamijo Namiko, Yukawa Shintaro
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2016 Feb;86(6):513-23. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.86.14037.
This study examined the relationship between meaning making and rumination regarding stressful events. We focused on two facets of rumination: intrusive and deliberate. Participants (N = 121) completed a questionnaire about a stressful event in their life that assessed the possibility of preventing the event, probability of the event occurring, perceived threat of the event, and meaning making. They also completed scales that assessed intrusive and deliberate ruminations about the event, posttraumatic growth after the event, as well as dispositions of self-rumination and self-reflection, and executive function. The results revealed that disposition of self-reflection was positively correlated with deliberate rumination about the event. Furthermore, deliberate rumination at the time of the experience was positively correlated with current positive meaning making, which was associated with current posttraumatic growth. Additionally, current intrusive rumination promoted current negative meaning making, but intrusive rumination at the time of the experience did not. Thus, this study suggests the important role of both intrusive and deliberate ruminations in the process of meaning making and several issues for future research.
本研究考察了在应激事件中意义建构与沉思之间的关系。我们聚焦于沉思的两个方面:侵入性沉思和深思熟虑性沉思。参与者(N = 121)完成了一份关于其生活中应激事件的问卷,该问卷评估了预防该事件的可能性、事件发生的概率、对该事件的感知威胁以及意义建构。他们还完成了一些量表,这些量表评估了对该事件的侵入性和深思熟虑性沉思、事件后的创伤后成长,以及自我沉思和自我反思的倾向,还有执行功能。结果显示,自我反思倾向与对该事件的深思熟虑性沉思呈正相关。此外,经历该事件时的深思熟虑性沉思与当前积极的意义建构呈正相关,而当前积极的意义建构与当前的创伤后成长相关。另外,当前的侵入性沉思促进了当前消极的意义建构,但经历该事件时的侵入性沉思并非如此。因此,本研究表明侵入性沉思和深思熟虑性沉思在意义建构过程中都起着重要作用,并提出了几个未来研究的问题。