Kimura Yurika, Ohno Keiko, Honjyo Motomu
Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho. 2015 Dec;118(12):1422-8. doi: 10.3950/jibiinkoka.118.1422.
The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, while defining a significant reduction of the medical fee points for gastrostomy in the medical fee revision of fiscal year 2014, assigned additional fee points for evaluation of the swallowing function by videofluoroscopy (VF) or videoendoscopy (VE) prior to gastrostomy. In addition, for facilities that carried out more than 50 gastrostomy operations, evaluation of the swallowing function was made mandatory in all cases and 35% of oral ingestion recovery rate to require the full amount calculation. Therefore, we evaluated the data on swallowing function evaluation in patients and gastrostomy at our hospital. During a 3-year period from February 2012, 114 patients who underwent gastrostomy at our hospital were enrolled. We evaluated the background disease, indications for gastrostomy, conduct/non-conduct of swallowing function tests prior to gastrostomy, videoendoscopic score (VE score), and the functional oral intake score before and after gastrostomy in the patients. The predominant background diseases were cerebrovascular disease (33%), Parkinson's syndrome (26%), and Alzheimer's disease (11%). The indications for gastrostomy were dysphagia (38%), request for gastrostomy from other hospitals or nursing care home (24%), and malnutrition due to anorexia (18%). The severity of the dysfunction was classified based on the VE score as mild (28%), moderate (47%), or severe (25%). Dysphagia did not reach the majority of reasons for gastrostomy and not few of background diseases were progressive neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease. Therefore, it remains under debate whether it is necessary to perform swallowing functional evaluation by VE or VF in all cases prior to gastrostomy. In some cases in which gastrostomy was indicated, the VE scores were not so high. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation based on the pathophysiology and social background is needed to judge the indication for gastrostomy. Leading support and participation in the calculation of additional fee points for the evaluation of swallowing function is an urgent issue for otolaryngologists.
厚生劳动省在2014财年医疗费用修订中大幅降低了胃造口术的医疗费用点数,但在胃造口术前通过荧光透视吞咽功能检查(VF)或视频内镜检查(VE)评估吞咽功能可获得额外的费用点数。此外,对于实施了50例以上胃造口术的机构,所有病例均须进行吞咽功能评估,且口服摄入量恢复率达35%才能全额计费。因此,我们对本院患者的吞咽功能评估和胃造口术数据进行了评估。在2012年2月起的3年期间,本院114例行胃造口术的患者纳入研究。我们评估了患者的基础疾病、胃造口术的适应证、胃造口术前吞咽功能测试的实施情况、视频内镜评分(VE评分)以及胃造口术前、后的功能性经口摄入量评分。主要基础疾病为脑血管疾病(33%)、帕金森综合征(26%)和阿尔茨海默病(11%)。胃造口术的适应证为吞咽困难(38%)、其他医院或养老院要求行胃造口术(24%)以及厌食导致的营养不良(18%)。根据VE评分,功能障碍的严重程度分为轻度(28%)、中度(47%)或重度(25%)。吞咽困难并非胃造口术的主要原因,且不少基础疾病为帕金森病等进行性神经疾病。因此,胃造口术前是否有必要常规行VE或VF吞咽功能评估仍存在争议。在一些有胃造口术指征的病例中,VE评分并不高。因此,需要基于病理生理学和社会背景进行综合评估以判断胃造口术的指征。对吞咽功能评估的额外费用点数计算提供主要支持和参与,是耳鼻喉科医生亟待解决的问题。