Suppr超能文献

含美罗培南/克拉维酸方案治疗耐多药和广泛耐药结核病的疗效和安全性。

Effectiveness and safety of meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB.

机构信息

Division of Infection, Barts Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK These authors contributed equally to this work.

Division of Infectious Diseases, CHU Saint-Pierre, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium These authors contributed equally to this work.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2016 Apr;47(4):1235-43. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02146-2015. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

Abstract

No large study has ever evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of meropenem/clavulanate to treat multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR- and XDR-TB). The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the therapeutic contribution, effectiveness, safety and tolerability profile of meropenem/clavulanate added to a background regimen when treating MDR- and XDR-TB cases.Patients treated with a meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimen (n=96) showed a greater drug resistance profile than those exposed to a meropenem/clavulanate-sparing regimen (n=168): in the former group XDR-TB was more frequent (49% versus 6.0%, p<0.0001) and the median (interquartile range (IQR)) number of antibiotic resistances was higher (8 (6-9)versus 5 (4-6)). Patients were treated with a meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimen for a median (IQR) of 85 (49-156) days.No statistically significant differences were observed in the overall MDR-TB cohort and in the subgroups with and without the XDR-TB patients; in particular, sputum smear and culture conversion rates were similar in XDR-TB patients exposed to meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens (88.0% versus 100.0%, p=1.00 and 88.0% versus 100.0%, p=1.00, respectively). Only six cases reported adverse events attributable to meropenem/clavulanate (four of them then restarting treatment).The nondifferent outcomes and bacteriological conversion rate observed in cases who were more severe than controls might imply that meropenem/clavulanate could be active in treating MDR- and XDR-TB cases.

摘要

尚未有研究评估美罗培南/克拉维酸治疗耐多药和广泛耐药结核病(MDR-TB 和 XDR-TB)的疗效、安全性和耐受性。本观察性研究旨在评估在 MDR-TB 和 XDR-TB 治疗中添加美罗培南/克拉维酸方案的治疗贡献、有效性、安全性和耐受性。

接受含美罗培南/克拉维酸方案治疗的患者(n=96)比接受不含美罗培南/克拉维酸方案治疗的患者(n=168)具有更高的耐药谱:前者中 XDR-TB 更为常见(49%对 6.0%,p<0.0001),中位数(四分位距(IQR))抗生素耐药数更高(8(6-9)对 5(4-6))。

接受含美罗培南/克拉维酸方案治疗的患者中位(IQR)治疗时间为 85(49-156)天。

在总体 MDR-TB 队列以及 XDR-TB 患者亚组和非 XDR-TB 患者亚组中,未观察到总体治疗结果和无统计学显著差异;具体而言,在接受含美罗培南/克拉维酸方案治疗的 XDR-TB 患者中,痰涂片和培养转换率相似(88.0%对 100.0%,p=1.00 和 88.0%对 100.0%,p=1.00)。仅报告了 6 例归因于美罗培南/克拉维酸的不良事件(其中 4 例随后重新开始治疗)。

与对照组相比,病情更严重的病例观察到无差异的结局和细菌学转换率,这可能意味着美罗培南/克拉维酸可能对治疗 MDR-TB 和 XDR-TB 病例有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验