Mioni Giovanna, Grassi Massimo, Tarantino Vincenza, Stablum Franca, Grondin Simon, Bisiacchi Patrizia S
Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.
Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padova, Italy.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Apr;78(3):742-8. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1082-y.
Previous studies have shown the presence of an interference effect on temporal perception when participants are required to simultaneously execute a nontemporal task. Such interference likely has an attentional source. In the present work, a temporal discrimination task was performed alone or together with a self-paced finger-tapping task used as concurrent, nontemporal task. Temporal durations were presented in either the visual or the auditory modality, and two standard durations (500 and 1,500 ms) were used. For each experimental condition, the participant's threshold was estimated and analyzed. The mean Weber fraction was higher in the visual than in the auditory modality, but only for the subsecond duration, and it was higher with the 500-ms than with the 1,500-ms standard duration. Interestingly, the Weber fraction was significantly higher in the dual-task condition, but only in the visual modality. The results suggest that the processing of time in the auditory modality is likely automatic, but not in the visual modality.
先前的研究表明,当参与者被要求同时执行一项非时间任务时,会对时间感知产生干扰效应。这种干扰可能源于注意力。在本研究中,单独进行了一项时间辨别任务,或者将其与一项作为并发非时间任务的自定节奏的手指敲击任务一起进行。时间持续时间以视觉或听觉方式呈现,并使用了两个标准持续时间(500毫秒和1500毫秒)。对于每个实验条件,估计并分析了参与者的阈值。视觉模态下的平均韦伯分数高于听觉模态,但仅在亚秒级持续时间内如此,并且500毫秒标准持续时间下的韦伯分数高于1500毫秒标准持续时间下的。有趣的是,双任务条件下的韦伯分数显著更高,但仅在视觉模态下如此。结果表明,听觉模态下的时间处理可能是自动的,但视觉模态下并非如此。