Byrne D J, Malek M M, Davey P G, Cuschieri A
Department of Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK.
Biomed Pharmacother. 1989;43(9):669-73. doi: 10.1016/0753-3322(89)90085-1.
Assessing postoperative wound sepsis rates is important from both an economic and an audit point of view. Most definitions of wound sepsis are too narrow and too subjective and wound scoring systems that have been developed to counteract these deficiencies suffer from a lack of objectivity, making valid comparisons between wound sepsis rates in different institutions impossible. The ASEPSIS scoring system is a definite advance in this area and its proven reproducibility makes it invaluable in multicentre trials assessing wound sepsis. However, it has limitations, mainly associated with the underlying assumption regarding the linearity of the ASEPSIS index. It is felt that by closely examining ASEPSIS wound scores from a large number of patients it may be possible to improve this scoring system.
从经济和审计的角度来看,评估术后伤口感染率都很重要。大多数伤口感染的定义过于狭窄且主观,为弥补这些缺陷而开发的伤口评分系统缺乏客观性,使得不同机构之间的伤口感染率无法进行有效比较。ASEPSIS评分系统在这一领域是一项明确的进步,其已被证实的可重复性使其在评估伤口感染的多中心试验中具有极高价值。然而,它也有局限性,主要与关于ASEPSIS指数线性的潜在假设有关。人们认为,通过仔细检查大量患者的ASEPSIS伤口评分,有可能改进这个评分系统。