Dubuisson J, Veit-Rubin N
Service de gynécologie, unité de chirurgie gynécologique, hôpitaux universitaires de Genève, 30, boulevard de la Cluse, 1205 Genève, Suisse.
Department of urogynaecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College London, Royaume-Uni.
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2016 Mar;44(3):175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
Abdominal hysterectomy remains the preferred approach for large uteri or in case of narrow vaginal access. However, the traditional morcellation techniques allow safe and efficient extraction when choosing the vaginal route. Uterine volume reductive techniques do not increase perioperative morbidity thus complications do not seem to be linked to uterine size. There are numerous advantages of the vaginal route in comparison with laparotomy, such as aesthetic benefits, decreased postoperative pain, reduced hospital stay and recovery as well as decreased perioperative morbidity. Compared to laparoscopy, surgical outcomes and blood loss of the vaginal approach of a large uterus seem to be similar. Nevertheless, laparoscopic hysterectomy is associated with longer operative time and significant increase in hospital cost. Hence, a thorough knowledge and mastery of uterine morcellation techniques are essential when performing vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri or when the vagina is narrow. They must therefore continue to be taught, spread and regularly used in order to stretch the indications for vaginal hysterectomy in favour of an abdominal approach.
对于巨大子宫或阴道入路狭窄的情况,腹式子宫切除术仍是首选方法。然而,在选择经阴道途径时,传统的碎解技术可实现安全有效的取出。子宫体积缩减技术不会增加围手术期发病率,因此并发症似乎与子宫大小无关。与剖腹手术相比,经阴道途径有诸多优点,如美观、术后疼痛减轻、住院时间和恢复时间缩短以及围手术期发病率降低。与腹腔镜手术相比,巨大子宫经阴道手术的手术效果和失血量似乎相似。然而,腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术时间较长且住院费用显著增加。因此,在对巨大子宫或阴道狭窄患者进行经阴道子宫切除术时,全面了解和掌握子宫碎解技术至关重要。因此,必须继续传授、推广并定期使用这些技术,以扩大经阴道子宫切除术的适应症,避免采用腹式手术。