Suppr超能文献

腹式子宫切除术与经阴道粉碎术治疗子宫增大的比较。

Abdominal hysterectomy versus transvaginal morcellation for the removal of enlarged uteri.

作者信息

Hoffman M S, DeCesare S, Kalter C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa 33606.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;171(2):309-13; discussion 313-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70028-1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the intraoperative and postoperative complications of transvaginal morcellation and abdominal hysterectomy for the removal of moderately enlarged uteri.

STUDY DESIGN

An observational study was performed on all uteri weighing > 200 gm removed transvaginally from July 1, 1987, to June 30, 1993. An abdominal hysterectomy control group was selected.

RESULTS

There were 50 patients in the vaginal group and 112 in the abdominal group. At a p value < 0.05 there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for age, parity, obesity, hypertension, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, or prior genitourinary surgery. The mean operative time in the vaginal hysterectomy group was 122 minutes and in the abdominal hysterectomy group 148 minutes (p < 0.05). The mean estimated blood loss was 527 and 586 ml, respectively (not significant). Twenty-two percent of the vaginal group and 70% of the abdominal group underwent bilateral oophorectomy (p < 0.05). The mean uterine weights were 335 and 336 gm, respectively (not significant). The mean day of starting a regular diet was 2.1 and 3.6, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean day of discharge was 3.6 and 5.1, respectively (p < 0.05). Complications were similar for the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients transvaginal morcellation is a safe and effective alternative to abdominal hysterectomy for the removal of moderately enlarged uteri. The two procedures are comparable in operative time, blood loss, and complications. Both ovaries are more likely to be removed with abdominal hysterectomy. Cosmesis and recuperation may be advantages of the vaginal approach.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较经阴道旋切术和腹式子宫切除术治疗中度增大子宫时的术中及术后并发症。

研究设计

对1987年7月1日至1993年6月30日期间经阴道切除的所有重量>200克的子宫进行了一项观察性研究。选取了腹式子宫切除术对照组。

结果

阴道组有50例患者,腹部组有112例。在p值<0.05时,两组在年龄、产次、肥胖、高血压、胰岛素依赖型糖尿病或既往泌尿生殖系统手术方面无统计学显著差异。阴道子宫切除术组的平均手术时间为122分钟,腹式子宫切除术组为148分钟(p<0.05)。平均估计失血量分别为527毫升和586毫升(无显著差异)。阴道组22%和腹部组70%的患者接受了双侧卵巢切除术(p<0.05)。平均子宫重量分别为335克和336克(无显著差异)。开始正常饮食的平均天数分别为2.1天和3.6天(p<0.05)。平均出院天数分别为3.6天和5.1天(p<0.05)。两组并发症相似。

结论

对于选定的患者,经阴道旋切术是切除中度增大子宫的一种安全有效的替代腹式子宫切除术的方法。这两种手术在手术时间、失血量和并发症方面具有可比性。腹式子宫切除术更有可能切除双侧卵巢。美观和恢复可能是经阴道手术的优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验