• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于解剖和数字系统的混合型胃癌淋巴结分期系统。

A Lymph Node Staging System for Gastric Cancer: A Hybrid Type Based on Topographic and Numeric Systems.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 11;11(3):e0149555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149555. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0149555
PMID:26967161
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4788413/
Abstract

Although changing a lymph node staging system from an anatomically based system to a numerically based system in gastric cancer offers better prognostic performance, several problems can arise: it does not offer information on the anatomical extent of disease and cannot represent the extent of lymph node dissection. The purpose of this study was to discover an alternative lymph node staging system for gastric cancer. Data from 6025 patients who underwent gastrectomy for primary gastric cancer between January 2000 and December 2010 were reviewed. The lymph node groups were reclassified into lesser-curvature, greater-curvature, and extra-perigastric groups. Presence of any metastatic lymph node in one group was considered positive. Lymph node groups were further stratified into four (new N0-new N3) according to the number of positive lymph node groups. Survival outcomes with this new N staging were compared with those of the current TNM system. For validation, two centers in Japan (large center, n = 3443; medium center, n = 560) were invited. Even among the same pN stages, the more advanced new N stage showed worse prognosis, indicating that the anatomical extent of metastatic lymph nodes is important. The prognostic performance of the new staging system was as good as that of the current TNM system for overall advanced gastric cancer as well as lymph node-positive gastric cancer (Harrell C-index was 0.799, 0.726, and 0.703 in current TNM and 0.799, 0.727, and 0.703 in new TNM stage). Validation sets supported these outcomes. The new N staging system demonstrated prognostic performance equal to that of the current TNM system and could thus be used as an alternative.

摘要

尽管将胃癌的淋巴结分期系统从解剖学基础系统改为基于数字的系统可以提供更好的预后性能,但也会出现一些问题:它不能提供疾病解剖范围的信息,也不能代表淋巴结清扫的范围。本研究旨在为胃癌寻找一种替代的淋巴结分期系统。回顾了 2000 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月期间接受胃切除术治疗原发性胃癌的 6025 例患者的数据。将淋巴结组重新分类为小曲率、大曲率和胃外组。如果一个组中有任何转移性淋巴结,则认为该组阳性。根据阳性淋巴结组的数量,将淋巴结组进一步细分为四个(新 N0-N3)。将该新 N 分期的生存结果与现行的 TNM 系统进行比较。为了验证,邀请了日本的两个中心(大中心,n=3443;中中心,n=560)。即使在相同的 pN 分期中,更高级别的新 N 分期也预示着更差的预后,这表明转移性淋巴结的解剖范围很重要。新分期系统对总体进展期胃癌和淋巴结阳性胃癌的预后性能与现行的 TNM 系统一样好(当前 TNM 的 Harrell C 指数为 0.799、0.726 和 0.703,新 TNM 分期为 0.799、0.727 和 0.703)。验证集支持这些结果。新的 N 分期系统显示出与现行 TNM 系统相当的预后性能,因此可以作为替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/4788413/a696344f030b/pone.0149555.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/4788413/ba7d39be771b/pone.0149555.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/4788413/c52ee1af672b/pone.0149555.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/4788413/a696344f030b/pone.0149555.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/4788413/ba7d39be771b/pone.0149555.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/4788413/c52ee1af672b/pone.0149555.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/4788413/a696344f030b/pone.0149555.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Lymph Node Staging System for Gastric Cancer: A Hybrid Type Based on Topographic and Numeric Systems.基于解剖和数字系统的混合型胃癌淋巴结分期系统。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 11;11(3):e0149555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149555. eCollection 2016.
2
Topographic lymph node staging system shows prognostic superiority compared to the 8th edition of AJCC TNM in gastric cancer. A western monocentric experience.胃癌的拓扑淋巴结分期系统优于第 8 版 AJCC TNM 分期系统,具有更好的预后预测价值。一项西方单中心经验。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;34:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
Comparison of the current AJCC-TNM numeric-based with a new anatomical location-based lymph node staging system for gastric cancer: A western experience.基于数字的现行美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)-TNM分期系统与一种新的基于解剖位置的胃癌淋巴结分期系统的比较:西方经验
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 5;12(4):e0173619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173619. eCollection 2017.
4
Anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes: an indispensable prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients who underwent curative resection.转移性淋巴结的解剖位置:接受根治性切除的胃癌患者不可或缺的预后因素。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb;53(2):185-192. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1415371. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
5
Superiority of lymph node ratio-based staging system for prognostic prediction in 2575 patients with gastric cancer: validation analysis in a large single center.基于淋巴结比率的分期系统在2575例胃癌患者预后预测中的优越性:大型单中心验证分析
Oncotarget. 2016 Aug 9;7(32):51069-51081. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9714.
6
Clinical implication of an insufficient number of examined lymph nodes after curative resection for gastric cancer.胃癌根治性切除术后淋巴结检出数目不足的临床意义。
Cancer. 2012 Oct 1;118(19):4687-93. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27426. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
7
Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.无论检查的淋巴结数量多少,淋巴结比率都是可切除(R0)胃癌患者的独立预后因素。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;36(4):325-30. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318246b4e9.
8
[Comparison of the prognostic value of UICC and JGCA lymph node staging criteria for gastric cancer].[UICC与JGCA胃癌淋巴结分期标准的预后价值比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008 May;30(5):376-80.
9
[Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in predicting overall survival for gastric cancer patients after radical resection].[三种淋巴结分期系统对胃癌根治术后患者总生存预测的比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Oct 25;19(10):1107-1112.
10
The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS for evaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer.RML 对淋巴结转移的预测价值优于 LODDS,可用于评估胃癌患者的预后。
Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):419-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association between the Number of Retrieved Lymph Nodes and Survival in Gastric Cancer Surgery: A Dutch Population-Based Study.胃癌手术中淋巴结清扫数量与生存的关联:一项基于荷兰人群的研究
Dig Surg. 2025 May 19:1-14. doi: 10.1159/000546436.
2
Refining gastric cancer staging: examining the interplay between number and anatomical location of metastatic lymph nodes - a retrospective multi-institutional study.胃癌分期的精细化:研究转移淋巴结数量和解剖位置的相互作用——一项回顾性多机构研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 5;23(1):1192. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11653-0.
3
Impact of Removal of Lymph Nodes on Survival in Stage I-III Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Cancer: The More, the Better?

本文引用的文献

1
Difficulty of predicting the presence of lymph node metastases in patients with clinical early stage gastric cancer: a case control study.临床早期胃癌患者淋巴结转移情况预测的困难:一项病例对照研究
BMC Cancer. 2015 Dec 1;15:943. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1940-3.
2
Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea, 2015.2015年韩国癌症发病率和死亡率预测
Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Apr;47(2):142-8. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.066. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
3
Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2012.
Ⅰ-Ⅲ期胃印戒细胞癌淋巴结清扫对生存的影响:多多益善?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb;31(2):783-791. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14590-1. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
4
Efficacy of Lymph Node Location-Number Hybrid Staging System on the Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients.淋巴结位置-数量混合分期系统对胃癌患者预后的疗效
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 8;15(9):2659. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092659.
5
Metastatic lymph nodes and prognosis assessed by the number of retrieved lymph nodes in gastric cancer.通过胃癌中获取的淋巴结数量评估转移性淋巴结与预后
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Nov 27;14(11):1230-1249. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i11.1230.
6
Tumor progression by epithelial-mesenchymal transition in ARID1A- and SMARCA4-aberrant solid-type poorly differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma.ARID1A和SMARCA4异常的实体型低分化胃腺癌中上皮-间质转化导致的肿瘤进展
Virchows Arch. 2022 May;480(5):1063-1075. doi: 10.1007/s00428-021-03261-9. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
7
Prognostic Value of the Anatomic Region of Metastatic Lymph Nodes in the Current TNM Staging of Gastric Cancer.转移性淋巴结解剖区域在胃癌当前TNM分期中的预后价值
J Gastric Cancer. 2021 Sep;21(3):236-245. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e22. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
8
Is there still a place for conventional histopathology in the age of molecular medicine? Laurén classification, inflammatory infiltration and other current topics in gastric cancer diagnosis and prognosis.在分子医学时代,传统组织病理学还有一席之地吗?劳伦分类、炎症浸润及胃癌诊断与预后的其他当前主题。
Histol Histopathol. 2021 Jun;36(6):587-613. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-309. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Clinical Implications of Microsatellite Instability in Early Gastric Cancer.早期胃癌中微卫星不稳定性的临床意义
J Gastric Cancer. 2019 Dec;19(4):427-437. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e38. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
10
Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.基于解剖部位的淋巴结分期系统优于第 7 版美国癌症联合委员会分期系统,适用于接受手术切除、组织学低级别胃癌的患者:单机构经验。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0211836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211836. eCollection 2019.
韩国癌症统计数据:2012年的发病率、死亡率、生存率及患病率
Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Apr;47(2):127-41. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.060. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
4
Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.全球癌症发病与死亡:GLOBOCAN 2012 数据源、方法与主要模式。
Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
5
Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer.第七版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌 TNM 分期系统的验证。
Cancer. 2011 Jun 1;117(11):2371-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25778. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
6
Prognostic implications of the seventh edition of the international union against cancer classification for patients with gastric cancer: the Western experience of patients treated in a single-center European institution.国际抗癌联盟第七版分类对胃癌患者预后的影响:单一中心欧洲机构治疗的患者的西方经验。
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 10;31(2):263-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.4315. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
7
A comparison between the seventh and sixth editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against classification of gastric cancer.第七版与第六版美国癌症联合委员会/国际抗癌联盟胃癌分类的比较。
Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):81-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825eff3f.
8
Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.无论检查的淋巴结数量多少,淋巴结比率都是可切除(R0)胃癌患者的独立预后因素。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;36(4):325-30. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318246b4e9.
9
A meta-analysis of D1 versus D2 lymph node dissection.D1 与 D2 淋巴结清扫术的荟萃分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2012 Sep;15 Suppl 1:S60-9. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0110-9. Epub 2011 Dec 3.
10
Is the new seventh AJCC/UICC staging system appropriate for patients with gastric cancer?新的第七版 AJCC/UICC 分期系统是否适用于胃癌患者?
J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Jan;214(1):88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.09.018. Epub 2011 Oct 29.