Trauma Center, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ.
Trauma Center, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ; Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Child Health, University of Arizona, College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 May;222(5):838-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.049. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
In many hospitals, children with suspected nonaccidental trauma (sNAT) are admitted to nonsurgical services (NSS). Although the surgical service (SS) initially admitted sNAT patients at our American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified level 1 pediatric trauma center (vPTC), a change in hospital policy allowed admission to NSS. The objective of this study was to determine if the rate of care-related indicators (CRIs) varies by admission to an SS vs an NSS in the sNAT patient population.
We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted to an ACS vPTC with a final diagnosis of sNAT between January 2009 and December 2013. The primary study outcome was the presence of a CRI. Surgical service and NSS admissions were compared on age, Injury Severity Score, and Abbreviated Injury Scale to account for population differences among admissions by service and type of CRIs, using chi-square or Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney tests. Rates of CRIs over time were also evaluated.
During the study period, 5,340 total patients were admitted-671 (13%) with sNAT. Nonsurgical services admitted 306 patients (46%) of these patients, but 71% (n = 102) of the CRIs occurred in patients admitted to an NSS. The rate of CRIs per 100 patients was 33 for NSS compared with 12 for SS (p < 0.001). The overall rate of CRIs for sNAT increased from 18 to 26 (p = 0.07) per 100 patients after the policy change.
Nonaccidental trauma patients admitted to an NSS were shown to have more CRIs than those admitted to an SS. This study supports an ACS requirement of admission of sNAT to an SS.
在许多医院,疑似非故意创伤(sNAT)的儿童被收治于非外科服务(NSS)。尽管我们的美国外科医师学院(ACS)认证的一级儿科创伤中心(vPTC)最初将 sNAT 患者收入外科服务(SS),但医院政策的改变允许将患者收入 NSS。本研究的目的是确定在 sNAT 患者人群中,与接受治疗相关的指标(CRIs)是否因收治于 SS 还是 NSS 而有所不同。
我们对 2009 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间在 ACS vPTC 入院并最终诊断为 sNAT 的患者进行了回顾性研究。主要研究结果为存在 CRI。SS 和 NSS 入院根据年龄、损伤严重程度评分和简明损伤评分进行比较,以解释因服务和 CRI 类型而导致的入院人群差异,使用卡方或 Fisher 确切检验和 Mann-Whitney 检验。还评估了随着时间的推移,CRIs 的发生率。
在研究期间,共有 5340 名患者入院,其中 671 名(13%)患有 sNAT。NSS 收治了其中 306 名患者(46%),但在 NSS 收治的患者中有 71%(n=102)发生了 CRI。NSS 每 100 名患者的 CRI 发生率为 33 例,而 SS 为 12 例(p<0.001)。政策改变后,sNAT 每 100 名患者的 CRI 总发生率从 18 例增加到 26 例(p=0.07)。
与收治于 SS 的患者相比,收治于 NSS 的 sNAT 患者的 CRI 更多。本研究支持 ACS 对 sNAT 患者收治于 SS 的要求。