Malik Marek
St. Paul's Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of London, NHLI, Imperial College, Dovehouse Street, London, SW3 6LY, England.
Drug Saf. 2016 Jul;39(7):647-59. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0411-3.
The review discusses safety implications of drugs found to shorten the QT/QTc interval. It uses parallels with drug-induced QT/QTc prolongation. It summarizes the evidence that increases in repolarization heterogeneity are likely more important for arrhythmia induction and maintenance than the absolute changes in the QT/QTc duration. The review further compares the direct evidence of proarrhythmia caused by QT-prolonging and -shortening drugs. At present, there is little proof of QT-shortening drugs causing ventricular fibrillation in more than rare isolated instances. Comparisons of the incidence of the congenital syndromes show that short QT syndrome is much rarer than long QT syndrome, similar to the findings of short QT intervals compared with long QT intervals in the general population. Nevertheless, potential concerns come from experimental drugs developed to increase the current of potassium-rectifying channels. Some of these drugs were found to cause ventricular fibrillation in isolated hearts. Still, population exposure to drug-induced QT shortening is likely substantially lower compared with QT prolongation, especially if considering that most of the processes that decrease the so-called repolarization reserve are associated with QT prolongation. Finally, the review lists reasons why purely theoretical concepts of pharmaceutical risk cannot be used to develop regulatory guidance and concludes that at present, no additional tests and/or general acceptance restrictions are needed for the approval of QT-shortening drugs.
本综述讨论了被发现可缩短QT/QTc间期的药物的安全性问题。它将其与药物诱导的QT/QTc延长进行了对比。综述总结了证据,即复极异质性的增加对心律失常的诱发和维持可能比QT/QTc间期的绝对变化更为重要。本综述进一步比较了QT延长药物和QT缩短药物导致心律失常的直接证据。目前,几乎没有证据表明QT缩短药物会在罕见的孤立病例之外导致室颤。先天性综合征发病率的比较表明,短QT综合征比长QT综合征罕见得多,这与普通人群中短QT间期与长QT间期的比较结果相似。然而,潜在的担忧来自于为增加钾整流通道电流而研发的实验性药物。其中一些药物被发现会在离体心脏中导致室颤。尽管如此,与QT延长相比,人群接触药物诱导的QT缩短的情况可能要少得多,特别是考虑到大多数降低所谓复极储备的过程都与QT延长有关。最后,综述列出了不能将纯粹的药物风险理论概念用于制定监管指南的原因,并得出结论,目前,批准QT缩短药物不需要额外的试验和/或普遍接受限制。