Sindone A, Erlich J, Lee C, Newman H, Suranyi M, Roger S D
Heart Failure Unit and Department of Cardiac Rehabilitation, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2016 Mar;46(3):364-72. doi: 10.1111/imj.12975.
Previously, management of hypertension has concentrated on lowering elevated blood pressure. However, the target has shifted to reducing absolute cardiovascular (CV) risk. It is estimated that two in three Australian adults have three or more CV risk factors at the same time. Moderate reductions in several risk factors can, therefore, be more effective than major reductions in one. When managing hypertension, therapy should be focused on medications with the strongest evidence for CV event reduction, substituting alternatives only when a primary choice is not appropriate. Hypertension management guidelines categorise angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) interchangeably as first-line treatments in uncomplicated hypertension. These medications have different mechanisms of action and quite different evidence bases. They are not interchangeable and their prescription should be based on clinical evidence. Despite this, currently ARB prescriptions are increasing at a higher rate than those for ACEI and other antihypertensive classes. Evidence that ACEI therapy prevents CV events and death, in patients with coronary artery disease or multiple CV risk factors, emerged from the European trial on reduction of cardiac events with perindopril in stable coronary artery disease (EUROPA) and Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) trials respectively. The consistent benefit has been demonstrated in meta-analyses. The clinical trial data for ARB are less consistent, particularly regarding CV outcomes and mortality benefit. The evidence supports the use of ACEI (Class 1a) compared with ARB despite current prescribing trends.
此前,高血压的管理主要集中在降低升高的血压。然而,目标已转向降低绝对心血管(CV)风险。据估计,三分之二的澳大利亚成年人同时存在三种或更多的CV风险因素。因此,适度降低几种风险因素可能比大幅降低一种风险因素更有效。在管理高血压时,治疗应侧重于有最强证据表明可降低CV事件的药物,仅在首选药物不合适时才更换为其他药物。高血压管理指南将血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)交替列为单纯性高血压的一线治疗药物。这些药物有不同的作用机制和截然不同的证据基础。它们不可互换,其处方应基于临床证据。尽管如此,目前ARB的处方增加速度高于ACEI和其他抗高血压药物类别。分别来自欧洲稳定冠状动脉疾病培哚普利心脏事件降低试验(EUROPA)和心脏结局预防评估(HOPE)试验的证据表明,ACEI治疗可预防冠状动脉疾病或多种CV风险因素患者的CV事件和死亡。荟萃分析已证明了这种一致的益处。ARB的临床试验数据不太一致,特别是在CV结局和死亡率获益方面。尽管目前有处方趋势,但证据支持使用ACEI(1a类)而非ARB。