Suppr超能文献

地西泮用于青少年拔除第三磨牙的麻醉并发症

Anesthesia Complications of Diazepam Use for Adolescents Receiving Extraction of Third Molars.

作者信息

Inverso Gino, Resnick Cory M, Gonzalez Martin L, Chuang Sung-Kiang

机构信息

Postgraduate Year 1 Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Attending Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jun;74(6):1140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.01.055. Epub 2016 Feb 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety of midazolam and diazepam for adolescents during third molar extraction and whether any differences in perioperative complications exist when using the 2 benzodiazepines alone or in combination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was performed in adolescents (<21 yr old) who underwent at least 1 third molar extraction by an oral and maxillofacial surgeon in the ambulatory setting from January 2001 through December 2010 using the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Outcomes System. The primary predictor variable was type of benzodiazepine used, divided into the total number of patients who received diazepam with or without midazolam. The outcome of interest was adverse complications resulting from anesthesia. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to measure the association between benzodiazepine type and adverse complications.

RESULTS

Patients in the diazepam group (n = 4,213) and in the combination group (n = 426) had a complication rate of 1.4%, whereas those in the midazolam group (n = 13,451) had a complication rate of 1.0% (P = .027). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed a 50% increased odds of adverse complications in patients receiving diazepam (adjusted odds ratio = 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 2.16; P = .027).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent patients who received intravenous diazepam during third molar procedures had an increased odds of anesthesia-related complications compared with those given midazolam.

摘要

目的

评估咪达唑仑和地西泮在青少年第三磨牙拔除术中的安全性,以及单独使用或联合使用这两种苯二氮䓬类药物时围手术期并发症是否存在差异。

材料与方法

对2001年1月至2010年12月期间在门诊接受至少一次第三磨牙拔除术的青少年(<21岁)进行前瞻性研究,使用口腔颌面外科手术结果系统,由口腔颌面外科医生操作。主要预测变量是使用的苯二氮䓬类药物类型,分为接受地西泮(无论是否联合咪达唑仑)的患者总数。感兴趣的结果是麻醉引起的不良并发症。应用多变量逻辑回归来衡量苯二氮䓬类药物类型与不良并发症之间的关联。

结果

地西泮组(n = 4213)和联合用药组(n = 426)的并发症发生率为1.4%,而咪达唑仑组(n = 13451)的并发症发生率为1.0%(P = 0.027)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,接受地西泮的患者发生不良并发症的几率增加50%(调整后的优势比 = 1.50;95%置信区间,1.05至2.16;P = 0.027)。

结论

与接受咪达唑仑的青少年患者相比,在第三磨牙手术中接受静脉注射地西泮的青少年患者发生麻醉相关并发症的几率增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验