Schwartsburd Polina
Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russ. Ac. Sci.; Institutskaya Street 3, Pushchino, Moscow Region 142290, Russia.
Med Hypotheses. 2016 Apr;89:8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
The survival of multi-cellular organisms depends on the organism ability to maintain glucose homeostasis for time of low/high nutrient availability or high energy needs, and the ability to fight infections or stress. These effects are realized through the insulin controlled transport of blood glucose into the insulin-responsive cells such as muscle, fat and liver cells. Reduction in the ability of these cells to take glucose from the blood in response to normal circulating levels of insulin is known as insulin resistance (IR). Chronic IR is a key pathological feature of obesity, type 2 diabetes, sepsis and cancer cachexia, however temporal IR are widely met in fasting/ hibernation, pregnancy, anti-bacterial immunity, exercise and stress. Paradoxically, a certain part of the IR-cases is associated with catabolic metabolism, whereas the other is related to anabolic pathways. How can this paradoxical IR-response be explained? What is the metabolic basis of this IR variability and its physiological and pathological impacts? An answer to these questions might be achieved through the hypothesis in which IR is considered as a two-sided mechanism acting under opposite metabolic conditions (catabolism and anabolism) but with the common aim to sustain glucose homeostasis in a wide metabolic range. To test this hypothesis, I examined the main metabolic distinctions between the varied IR-cases and their dependence on the blood glucose concentration, level of the IR-threshold, and catabolic/anabolic activation. On the basis of the established interrelations, a simple model of IR-distribution has been developed. The model revealed the «U-type distribution» form with separation into two main IR-groups, each determined in the catabolic or anabolic conditions with one exception - type 2 diabetes and its paradoxical catabolic activation in anabolic conditions. The dual opposing (or complementary) role for the IR opens a new possibility for better understanding the cause and consequences of transition from adaptive IR-responses to its pathological forms.
多细胞生物的生存取决于生物体在营养供应低/高或能量需求高时维持葡萄糖稳态的能力,以及抵抗感染或应激的能力。这些作用是通过胰岛素控制血糖转运进入胰岛素反应性细胞,如肌肉、脂肪和肝细胞来实现的。这些细胞在正常循环胰岛素水平下从血液中摄取葡萄糖的能力降低被称为胰岛素抵抗(IR)。慢性IR是肥胖、2型糖尿病、脓毒症和癌症恶病质的关键病理特征,然而,在禁食/冬眠、妊娠、抗菌免疫、运动和应激等情况下,短暂性IR也很常见。矛盾的是,一部分IR病例与分解代谢相关,而另一部分则与合成代谢途径有关。如何解释这种矛盾的IR反应?这种IR变异性的代谢基础及其生理和病理影响是什么?通过将IR视为一种在相反代谢条件(分解代谢和合成代谢)下起作用但具有在广泛代谢范围内维持葡萄糖稳态这一共同目标的双向机制的假设,或许可以找到这些问题的答案。为了验证这一假设,我研究了不同IR病例之间的主要代谢差异及其对血糖浓度、IR阈值水平和分解代谢/合成代谢激活的依赖性。基于已建立的相互关系,开发了一个简单的IR分布模型。该模型揭示了“U型分布”形式,分为两个主要的IR组,每组在分解代谢或合成代谢条件下确定,但有一个例外——2型糖尿病及其在合成代谢条件下的矛盾性分解代谢激活。IR的双重对立(或互补)作用为更好地理解从适应性IR反应转变为其病理形式的原因和后果开辟了新的可能性。