Suppr超能文献

一种用于自动丙泊酚镇静的新型系统:混合镇静系统(HSS)。

A novel system for automated propofol sedation: hybrid sedation system (HSS).

作者信息

Zaouter Cedrick, Taddei Riccardo, Wehbe Mohamad, Arbeid Erik, Cyr Shantale, Giunta Francesco, Hemmerling Thomas M

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Cardiac Intensive Care, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation II, CHU Bordeaux, Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33604, France.

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Apr;31(2):309-317. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9858-0. Epub 2016 Mar 12.

Abstract

Closed-loop systems for propofol have been demonstrated to be safe and reliable for general anesthesia. However, no study has been conducted using a closed-loop system specifically designed for sedation in patients under spinal anesthesia. We developed an automatic anesthesia sedation system that allows for closed-loop delivery of propofol for sedation integrating a decision support system, called the hybrid sedation system (HSS). The objective of this study is to compare this system with standard practice. One hundred fifty patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: HSS-Group (N = 75), in which propofol was administered using a closed-loop system; Control Group (N = 75), in which propofol was delivered manually. The clinical performance of the propofol sedation control is defined as efficacy to maintain bispectral index (BIS) near 65. The clinical control was called 'Excellent', 'Good', 'Poor' and 'Inadequate' with BIS values within 10 %, from 11 to 20 %, 21 to 30 %, or greater than 30 % of the BIS target of 65, respectively. The controller performance was evaluated using Varvel's parameters. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, groups were compared using t test or Chi square test, P < 0.05. Clinical performance of sedation showed 'Excellent' control in the HSS-group for a significantly longer period of time (49 vs. 26 % in the control group, P < 0.0001). 'Poor' and 'Inadequate' sedation was significantly shorter in the HSS Group compared to the Control Group (11 and 10 % vs. 20 and 18 %, respectively, P < 0.0001). The novel, closed-loop system for propofol sedation showed better maintenance of the target BIS value compared to manual administration.

摘要

已证明用于丙泊酚的闭环系统在全身麻醉中是安全可靠的。然而,尚未有研究使用专门为脊髓麻醉患者镇静设计的闭环系统。我们开发了一种自动麻醉镇静系统,该系统允许通过集成决策支持系统(称为混合镇静系统,HSS)进行丙泊酚的闭环给药以实现镇静。本研究的目的是将该系统与标准做法进行比较。150例患者入组并随机分为两组:HSS组(N = 75),使用闭环系统给予丙泊酚;对照组(N = 75),手动给予丙泊酚。丙泊酚镇静控制的临床性能定义为将脑电双频指数(BIS)维持在65左右的有效性。临床控制根据BIS值分别在BIS目标值65的10%以内、11%至20%、21%至30%或大于30%被称为“优秀”、“良好”、“差”和“不足”。使用Varvel参数评估控制器性能。数据以平均值±标准差表示,组间比较采用t检验或卡方检验,P < 0.05。镇静的临床性能显示,HSS组“优秀”控制的时间明显更长(49%对对照组的26%,P < 0.0001)。与对照组相比,HSS组“差”和“不足”的镇静时间明显更短(分别为11%和10%对20%和18%,P < 0.0001)。与手动给药相比,新型丙泊酚镇静闭环系统在维持目标BIS值方面表现更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验