Oostendorp Rob A B, Bakker Iem, Elvers Hans, Mikolajewska Emilia, Michiels Sarah, De Hertogh Willem, Samwel Han
Department of Manual Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Pain in Motion International Research Group(1), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Practice for Manual Therapy, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Man Ther. 2016 Jun;23:106-13. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 21.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Manual Therapy Utrecht (MTU) plus education in patients with cervicogenic somatosensory tinnitus (CeT).
Pretest-posttest design.
Five hundred and six patients were referred or referred themselves. A subgroup of patients was identified with CeT, and within this a subgroup with tinnitus sensitization (TS). Two CeT groups were created based on the presence or absence of TS. Both groups underwent manual therapy combined with tinnitus education. Tinnitus intensity (VAS-tin 0-100 mm) was the primary outcome measure. Number of treatments and adverse effects were the secondary outcome measures.
A total of 122 patients with CeT (24.1%) were included (average age 53.3 years [±9.8], female 38.5% and duration of tinnitus 7.3 years [±8.9]). Patients were divided into two groups: 55 patients (45.1%) with TS (CeT + TS group) and 67 patients (54.9%) without TS (CeT - TS group). Pretest to posttest differences on the VAS-tin were statistically significant within both groups (CeT - TS group: difference VAS-tin 5.9 [p = 0.01]; CeT + TS group: difference VAS-tin 18.2 [p = 0.00]), and between the groups in favor of the CeT + TS group (difference VAS-tin 12.3 [p = 0.01]). Pretest to posttest differences were clinically significant for the CeT + TS group (difference VAS-tin 18.2 [MCIC = ≥10 mm VAS-tin]) and between the groups (difference VAS-tin 12.3 in favor of the CeT + TS group). The average number of treatment sessions was 9.6 (±2.6) for the CeT - TS group and 10.3 (±2.5) for the CeT + TS group, a non-significant difference. There were no adverse effects in either group.
Despite its limitations, this study provides valuable information on both the characteristics of patients with CeT and TS in a Dutch primary care manual therapy practice and on the potential effectiveness of MTU combined with tinnitus education for the subgroup of CeT + TS patients.
本研究旨在评估乌得勒支手法治疗(MTU)加教育对颈源性体感耳鸣(CeT)患者的疗效。
前后测试设计。
506名患者被转诊或自行前来。确定了CeT患者亚组,其中又有一个耳鸣敏化(TS)亚组。根据是否存在TS创建了两个CeT组。两组均接受手法治疗并结合耳鸣教育。耳鸣强度(VAS-tin 0 - 100毫米)是主要结局指标。治疗次数和不良反应是次要结局指标。
共纳入122例CeT患者(24.1%)(平均年龄53.3岁[±9.8],女性占38.5%,耳鸣持续时间7.3年[±8.9])。患者分为两组:55例(45.1%)有TS的患者(CeT + TS组)和67例(54.9%)无TS的患者(CeT - TS组)。两组内VAS-tin的前后测试差异均具有统计学意义(CeT - TS组:VAS-tin差异5.9[p = 0.01];CeT + TS组:VAS-tin差异18.2[p = 0.00]),且两组间差异对CeT + TS组有利(VAS-tin差异12.3[p = 0.01])。CeT + TS组的前后测试差异具有临床意义(VAS-tin差异18.2[MCIC = ≥10毫米VAS-tin]),且两组间差异(VAS-tin差异12.3,对CeT + TS组有利)也具有临床意义。CeT - TS组的平均治疗次数为9.6(±2.6)次,CeT + TS组为10.3(±2.5)次,差异无统计学意义。两组均未出现不良反应。
尽管本研究存在局限性,但它提供了关于荷兰初级保健手法治疗实践中CeT和TS患者特征的有价值信息,以及MTU结合耳鸣教育对CeT + TS患者亚组的潜在有效性信息。