Day-Brown Jonathan D, Slusarczyk Arkadiusz S, Zhou Na, Quiggins Ranida, Petry Heywood M, Bickford Martha E
Department of Psychology, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, 25755.
Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, 40202.
J Comp Neurol. 2017 Apr 15;525(6):1403-1420. doi: 10.1002/cne.23998. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
The tree shrew (Tupaia belangeri) striate cortex is reciprocally connected with the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN), the ventral pulvinar nucleus (Pv), and the claustrum. In the Pv or the dLGN, striate cortex projections are thought to either strongly "drive", or more subtly "modulate" activity patterns respectively. To provide clues to the function of the claustrum, we compare the synaptic arrangements of striate cortex projections to the dLGN, Pv, and claustrum, using anterograde tracing and electron microscopy. Tissue was additionally stained with antibodies against γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) to identify GABAergic interneurons and non-GABAergic projection cells. The striate cortex terminals were largest in the Pv (0.94 ± 0.08 μm ), intermediate in the claustrum (0.34 ± 0.02 μm ), and smallest in the dLGN (0.24 ± 0.01 μm ). Contacts on interneurons were most common in the Pv (39%), intermediate in the claustrum (15%), and least common in the dLGN (12%). In the claustrum, non-GABAergic terminals (0.34 ± 0.01 μm ) and striate cortex terminals were not significantly different in size. The largest terminals in the claustrum were GABAergic (0.51 ± 0.02 μm ), and these terminals contacted dendrites and somata that were significantly larger (1.90 ± 0.30 μm ) than those contacted by cortex or non-GABAergic terminals (0.28 ± 0.02 μm and 0.25 ± 0.02 μm , respectively). Our results indicate that the synaptic organization of the claustrum does not correspond to a driver/modulator framework. Instead, the circuitry of the claustrum suggests an integration of convergent cortical inputs, gated by GABAergic circuits. J. Comp. Neurol. 525:1403-1420, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
树鼩(Tupaia belangeri)的纹状皮层与背外侧膝状体核(dLGN)、腹侧丘脑枕核(Pv)和屏状核相互连接。在Pv或dLGN中,纹状皮层投射分别被认为要么强烈“驱动”,要么更微妙地“调节”活动模式。为了探究屏状核的功能,我们使用顺行示踪和电子显微镜比较了纹状皮层向dLGN、Pv和屏状核投射的突触排列。组织还用抗γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)抗体染色,以识别GABA能中间神经元和非GABA能投射细胞。纹状皮层终末在Pv中最大(0.94±0.08μm),在屏状核中居中(0.34±0.02μm),在dLGN中最小(0.24±0.01μm)。与中间神经元的接触在Pv中最常见(39%),在屏状核中居中(15%),在dLGN中最不常见(12%)。在屏状核中,非GABA能终末(0.34±0.01μm)和纹状皮层终末在大小上无显著差异。屏状核中最大的终末是GABA能的(0.51±0.02μm),这些终末与比皮层或非GABA能终末所接触的树突和胞体显著更大(1.90±0.30μm)(分别为0.28±0.02μm和0.25±0.02μm)。我们的结果表明,屏状核的突触组织不符合驱动/调节框架。相反,屏状核的神经回路表明汇聚的皮层输入通过GABA能回路进行整合。《比较神经学杂志》525:1403 - 1420,2017。©2016威利期刊公司