Jones Alvin
Womack Army Medical Center, Ft. Bragg, NC, USA
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016 May;31(3):273-83. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw006. Epub 2016 Mar 13.
This research examined cutoff scores for the Effort Index (EI), an embedded measure of performance validity, for the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status. EI cutoffs were explored for an active-duty military sample composed mostly of patients with traumatic brain injury.
Four psychometrically defined malingering groups including a definite malingering, probable to definite malingering, probable malingering, and a combined group were formed based on the number of validity tests failed.
Excellent specificities (0.97 or greater) were found for all cutoffs examined (EI ≥ 1 to EI ≥ 3). Excellent sensitivities (0.80 to 0.89) were also found for the definite malingering group. Sensitivities were 0.49 or below for the other groups. Positive and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios indicated that the cutoffs for EI were much stronger for ruling-in than ruling-out malingering. Analyses indicated the validity tests used to form the malingering groups were uncorrelated, which serves to enhance the validity of the formation of the malingering groups.
Cutoffs were similar to other research using samples composed predominantly of head-injured individuals.
本研究探讨了用于评估神经心理状态的可重复成套测验中效绩指数(EI)的临界值,EI是一种表现效度的内在测量指标。针对一个主要由创伤性脑损伤患者组成的现役军人样本,探索了EI的临界值。
根据未能通过的效度测验数量,形成了四个心理测量学定义的伪装组,包括明确伪装组、可能到明确伪装组、可能伪装组和一个合并组。
对于所有检查的临界值(EI≥1至EI≥3),均发现了出色的特异性(0.97或更高)。明确伪装组也发现了出色的敏感性(0.80至0.89)。其他组的敏感性为0.49或更低。阳性和阴性预测值以及似然比表明,EI的临界值在诊断伪装方面的排除能力比诊断能力强得多。分析表明,用于形成伪装组的效度测验不相关,这有助于提高伪装组形成的效度。
临界值与其他主要使用头部受伤个体样本的研究结果相似。