Suppr超能文献

目的:咳嗽频率、气道炎症与哮喘疾病控制。

Objective Cough Frequency, Airway Inflammation, and Disease Control in Asthma.

机构信息

Centre for Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, University of Manchester, and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, England; University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England; Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, England.

Centre for Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, University of Manchester, and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, England; University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England.

出版信息

Chest. 2016 Jun;149(6):1460-6. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.676. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cough is recognized as an important troublesome symptom in the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma. Asthma control is thought to be determined by the degree of airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness but how these factors relate to cough frequency is unclear. The goal of this study was to investigate the relationships between objective cough frequency, disease control, airflow obstruction, and airway inflammation in asthma.

METHODS

Participants with asthma underwent 24-h ambulatory cough monitoring and assessment of exhaled nitric oxide, spirometry, methacholine challenge, and sputum induction (cell counts and inflammatory mediator levels). Asthma control was assessed by using the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) classification and the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ). The number of cough sounds was manually counted and expressed as coughs per hour (c/h).

RESULTS

Eighty-nine subjects with asthma (mean ± SD age, 57 ± 12 years; 57% female) were recruited. According to GINA criteria, 18 (20.2%) patients were classified as controlled, 39 (43.8%) partly controlled, and 32 (36%) uncontrolled; the median ACQ score was 1 (range, 0.0-4.4). The 6-item ACQ correlated with 24-h cough frequency (r = 0.40; P < .001), and patients with uncontrolled asthma (per GINA criteria) had higher median 24-h cough frequency (4.2 c/h; range, 0.3-27.6) compared with partially controlled asthma (1.8 c/h; range, 0.2-25.3; P = .01) and controlled asthma (1.7 c/h; range, 0.3-6.7; P = .002). Measures of airway inflammation were not significantly different between GINA categories and were not correlated with ACQ. In multivariate analyses, increasing cough frequency and worsening FEV1 independently predicted measures of asthma control.

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory cough frequency monitoring provides an objective assessment of asthma symptoms that correlates with standard measures of asthma control but not airflow obstruction or airway inflammation. Moreover, cough frequency and airflow obstruction represent independent dimensions of asthma control.

摘要

背景

咳嗽被认为是诊断和监测哮喘的重要症状。哮喘控制被认为取决于气道炎症和高反应性的程度,但这些因素与咳嗽频率的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是探讨哮喘患者的客观咳嗽频率、疾病控制、气流阻塞和气道炎症之间的关系。

方法

哮喘患者接受 24 小时动态咳嗽监测和呼气一氧化氮评估、肺量测定、乙酰甲胆碱挑战和痰诱导(细胞计数和炎症介质水平)。使用全球哮喘倡议(GINA)分类和哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)评估哮喘控制。手动计数咳嗽声并表示为每小时咳嗽次数(c/h)。

结果

共招募 89 例哮喘患者(平均年龄±标准差,57±12 岁;57%为女性)。根据 GINA 标准,18 例(20.2%)患者被归类为控制良好,39 例(43.8%)部分控制,32 例(36%)未控制;ACQ 中位数为 1(范围,0.0-4.4)。6 项 ACQ 与 24 小时咳嗽频率相关(r=0.40;P<0.001),根据 GINA 标准,未控制哮喘患者(4.2 c/h;范围,0.3-27.6)的 24 小时咳嗽频率中位数高于部分控制哮喘患者(1.8 c/h;范围,0.2-25.3;P=0.01)和控制良好哮喘患者(1.7 c/h;范围,0.3-6.7;P=0.002)。气道炎症指标在 GINA 类别之间无显著差异,与 ACQ 也无相关性。多变量分析显示,咳嗽频率增加和 FEV1 恶化独立预测哮喘控制指标。

结论

动态咳嗽频率监测提供了哮喘症状的客观评估,与哮喘控制的标准测量相关,但与气流阻塞或气道炎症无关。此外,咳嗽频率和气流阻塞是哮喘控制的独立维度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验