Maes Pieter-Jan
Department of Art, Music, and Theatre Sciences, IPEM, Ghent University Belgium.
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 4;7:308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00308. eCollection 2016.
In a previous article, we reviewed empirical evidence demonstrating action-based effects on music perception to substantiate the musical embodiment thesis (Maes et al., 2014). Evidence was largely based on studies demonstrating that music perception automatically engages motor processes, or that body states/movements influence music perception. Here, we argue that more rigorous evidence is needed before any decisive conclusion in favor of a "radical" musical embodiment thesis can be posited. In the current article, we provide a focused review of recent research to collect further evidence for the "radical" embodiment thesis that music perception is a dynamic process firmly rooted in the natural disposition of sounds and the human auditory and motor system. Though, we emphasize that, on top of these natural dispositions, long-term processes operate, rooted in repeated sensorimotor experiences and leading to learning, prediction, and error minimization. This approach sheds new light on the development of musical repertoires, and may refine our understanding of action-based effects on music perception as discussed in our previous article (Maes et al., 2014). Additionally, we discuss two of our recent empirical studies demonstrating that music performance relies on similar principles of sensorimotor dynamics and predictive processing.
在之前的一篇文章中,我们回顾了实证证据,这些证据表明基于动作的因素对音乐感知有影响,以证实音乐具身化理论(梅斯等人,2014年)。证据主要基于一些研究,这些研究表明音乐感知会自动激活运动过程,或者身体状态/动作会影响音乐感知。在此,我们认为在能够得出支持“激进”音乐具身化理论的任何决定性结论之前,需要更严格的证据。在本文中,我们对近期研究进行了重点回顾,以收集更多证据来支持“激进”具身化理论,即音乐感知是一个动态过程,深深植根于声音的自然属性以及人类听觉和运动系统。不过,我们强调,除了这些自然属性之外,长期过程也在起作用,这些过程植根于反复的感觉运动体验,并导致学习、预测和错误最小化。这种方法为音乐曲目的发展提供了新的视角,并且可能会完善我们对前文(梅斯等人,2014年)中所讨论的基于动作的因素对音乐感知的影响的理解。此外,我们还讨论了我们最近的两项实证研究,这些研究表明音乐表演依赖于类似的感觉运动动力学和预测处理原则。