The authors reply.
作者信息
Sterling Sarah A, Puskarich Michael A, Jones Alan E
机构信息
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, School of Medicine, Jackson, MS.
出版信息
Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):e235-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001550.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The authors reply.作者回复。
Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):e235-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001550.
2
The authors reply.作者回复。
Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):e110. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001513.
3
The authors reply.作者回复。
Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):e237. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001546.
4
The authors reply.
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):e50-1. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001368.
5
Timing of Appropriate Antibiotics in Sepsis: How Much Does Each Hour Matter?
Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;44(2):e109-10. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001449.
6
Timing of Therapy in Sepsis: Are Early Antibiotics Important for Prognosis?
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2030-1. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001179.
7
Systematic Bias in Meta-Analyses of Time to Antimicrobial in Sepsis Studies.脓毒症研究中抗菌药物使用时间的Meta分析中的系统偏倚
Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):e234-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001512.
8
Time for a Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate Optimal Time to Antibiotics for Patients With Sepsis.
Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):e236-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001514.
9
The authors reply.作者回复。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):e802-3. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000679.
10
Meta-analysis based on limited data shows no evidence to support the guideline recommendation for early administration of antibiotics in severe sepsis and septic shock.
Evid Based Med. 2015 Dec;20(6):214-5. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2015-110269. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
本文引用的文献
1
Systematic Bias in Meta-Analyses of Time to Antimicrobial in Sepsis Studies.脓毒症研究中抗菌药物使用时间的Meta分析中的系统偏倚
Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):e234-5. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001512.
2
The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗生素使用时机对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克预后的影响：一项系统评价和Meta分析
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1907-15. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001142.
3
A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock.一项基于方案的早期脓毒性休克护理的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
4
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动：严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南：2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
5
Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial.乳酸清除率与中心静脉血氧饱和度作为早期脓毒症治疗目标的比较：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2010 Feb 24;303(8):739-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.158.
6
Etiology of illness in patients with severe sepsis admitted to the hospital from the emergency department.急诊科收治的严重脓毒症患者的疾病病因。
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Mar 15;50(6):814-20. doi: 10.1086/650580.
7
National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments.美国急诊科严重脓毒症的全国性评估。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1928-36. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000277043.85378.C1.
Zotero 插件