Amabile Celia, Choisne Julie, Nérot Agathe, Pillet Hélène, Skalli Wafa
Arts et Métiers ParisTech, LBM/Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Paris, France; Spine Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, Belaire 4-E, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Arts et Métiers ParisTech, LBM/Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Paris, France.
J Biomech. 2016 May 3;49(7):1162-1169. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
Body segment parameters (BSP) for each body׳s segment are needed for biomechanical analysis. To provide population-specific BSP, precise estimation of body׳s segments volume and density are needed. Widely used uniform densities, provided by cadavers׳ studies, did not consider the air present in the lungs when determining the thorax density. The purpose of this study was to propose a new uniform thorax density representative of the living population from 3D external body shape modeling. Bi-planar X-ray radiographies were acquired on 58 participants allowing 3D reconstructions of the spine, rib cage and human body shape. Three methods of computing the thorax mass were compared for 48 subjects: (1) the Dempster Uniform Density Method, currently in use for BSPs calculation, using Dempster density data, (2) the Personalized Method using full-description of the thorax based on 3D reconstruction of the rib cage and spine and (3) the Improved Uniform Density Method using a uniform thorax density resulting from the Personalized Method. For 10 participants, comparison was made between the body mass obtained from a force-plate and the body mass computed with each of the three methods. The Dempster Uniform Density Method presented a mean error of 4.8% in the total body mass compared to the force-plate vs 0.2% for the Personalized Method and 0.4% for the Improved Uniform Density Method. The adjusted thorax density found from the 3D reconstruction was 0.74g/cm(3) for men and 0.73g/cm(3) for women instead of the one provided by Dempster (0.92g/cm(3)), leading to a better estimate of the thorax mass and body mass.
生物力学分析需要每个身体节段的身体节段参数(BSP)。为了提供特定人群的BSP,需要精确估计身体节段的体积和密度。尸体研究提供的广泛使用的均匀密度在确定胸部密度时没有考虑肺部存在的空气。本研究的目的是通过三维外部身体形状建模提出一种代表现有人口的新的均匀胸部密度。对58名参与者进行了双平面X射线摄影,以实现脊柱、胸廓和人体形状的三维重建。对48名受试者比较了三种计算胸部质量的方法:(1)目前用于BSP计算的登普斯特均匀密度法,使用登普斯特密度数据;(2)基于胸廓和脊柱三维重建对胸部进行全面描述的个性化方法;(3)使用个性化方法得出的均匀胸部密度的改进均匀密度法。对10名参与者,比较了通过力板获得的体重与用这三种方法中的每一种计算出的体重。与力板相比,登普斯特均匀密度法在总体重上的平均误差为4.8%,而个性化方法为0.2%,改进均匀密度法为0.4%。从三维重建中得出的调整后的胸部密度男性为0.74g/cm³,女性为0.73g/cm³,而不是登普斯特提供的密度(0.92g/cm³),从而能更好地估计胸部质量和体重。