Loggers Elizabeth T, LeBlanc Thomas W, El-Jawahri Areej, Fihn Judy, Bumpus Molly, David Jodie, Horak Petr, Lee Stephanie J
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Clinical Research Division, Seattle, Washington; Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Palliative Care Service, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington.
Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina; Program in Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jul;22(7):1299-1305. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
Early palliative care (EPC) for patients with metastatic solid tumors is now standard of care, but the effect of EPC in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is less well understood. We studied the acceptability of pre-HCT EPC as measured by trial participation, changes in patient-reported outcomes, and follow-up with palliative care providers. English-speaking adults (age >17 years) with an HCT comorbidity index of ≥ 3, relapse risk > 25%, or planned HLA-mismatched allogeneic or myeloablative HCT received EPC before HCT admission with monthly or more frequent visits. Twenty-two (69%) of 32 subjects provided consent; 2 were later excluded (HCT cancelled, consent retracted) for a 63% participation rate. Comfort with EPC was high (82% very comfortable). Subjects reported stable or improved mood and sense of hope, without apparent negative effects with a median of 3 visits. Follow-up surveys were returned by 75% of participants at 60 days and by 65% at 90 days. Four (20%) were admitted to the intensive care unit before day 100 and 3 (15%) received life-support measures. Five (25%) died with median follow-up of 14 months. EPC is feasible, acceptable, and has the potential to improve the HCT experience, whether or not the patient survives. EPC for HCT patients should be tested in a randomized trial.
对于转移性实体瘤患者,早期姑息治疗(EPC)现已成为标准治疗方案,但EPC在造血细胞移植(HCT)中的效果尚不太清楚。我们通过试验参与情况、患者报告结局的变化以及对姑息治疗提供者的随访,研究了HCT前EPC的可接受性。合并HCT且合并症指数≥3、复发风险>25%或计划进行HLA不匹配的异基因或清髓性HCT的成年英语使用者(年龄>17岁)在HCT入院前接受EPC,每月或更频繁就诊。32名受试者中有22名(69%)提供了同意;2名受试者后来被排除(HCT取消,同意撤回),参与率为63%。对EPC的舒适度较高(82%非常舒适)。受试者报告情绪和希望感稳定或改善,在中位就诊3次的情况下没有明显负面影响。75%的参与者在60天时返回了随访调查,65%的参与者在90天时返回了随访调查。4名(20%)在第100天前入住重症监护病房,3名(15%)接受了生命支持措施。5名(25%)患者死亡,中位随访时间为14个月。无论患者是否存活,EPC都是可行的、可接受的,并且有可能改善HCT体验。HCT患者的EPC应在随机试验中进行测试。