• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Implementation Science Workshop: Engaging Patients in Team-Based Practice Redesign - Critical Reflections on Program Design.

作者信息

Davis Sarah, Berkson Stephanie, Gaines Martha E, Prajapati Pratik, Schwab William, Pandhi Nancy, Edgman-Levitan Susan

机构信息

Center for Patient Partnerships, University of Wisconsin, 975 Bascom Mall - Suite 4311, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.

University of Wisconsin Law School, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31(6):688-95. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3656-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-016-3656-8
PMID:26976290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4870427/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a2/4870427/35d39cfc39f4/11606_2016_3656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a2/4870427/35d39cfc39f4/11606_2016_3656_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76a2/4870427/35d39cfc39f4/11606_2016_3656_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementation Science Workshop: Engaging Patients in Team-Based Practice Redesign - Critical Reflections on Program Design.实施科学研讨会：让患者参与基于团队的实践重新设计——对项目设计的批判性反思
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jun;31(6):688-95. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3656-8.
2
Implementation Science Workshop: primary care-based multidisciplinary readmission prevention program.实施科学研讨会：基于初级保健的多学科再入院预防计划
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 May;29(5):798-804. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2819-8.
3
10 Ways to Keep Your Quality Improvement Team Motivated.保持质量改进团队积极性的10种方法。
Fam Pract Manag. 2018 Sep/Oct;25(5):23-26.
4
The Scottish patient safety programme in primary care: context, interventions and early outcomes.苏格兰初级医疗中的患者安全计划：背景、干预措施及早期成果。
Scott Med J. 2015 Nov;60(4):192-5. doi: 10.1177/0036933015606577. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
5
Redesigning the response to patients with trauma.重新设计对创伤患者的应对措施。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2012 Jun;19(3):31-6. doi: 10.7748/nm2012.06.19.3.31.c9120.
6
Implementing a knowledge application program for anxiety and depression in community-based primary mental health care: a multiple case study research protocol.实施社区基层精神卫生保健中焦虑和抑郁的知识应用程序：一项多案例研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2013 Mar 4;8:26. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-26.
7
Engaging Patients in Primary Care Quality Improvement Initiatives: Facilitators and Barriers.参与初级保健质量改进计划的患者：促进因素和障碍。
Am J Med Qual. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):52-62. doi: 10.1177/1062860619842938. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
8
An Implementation Science Approach to Handoff Redesign in a Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit.实施科学方法在心外科重症监护病房交接班流程的再设计。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jun;109(6):1782-1788. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.09.047. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
9
Building high functioning clinical teams through quality improvement initiatives.通过质量改进举措打造高效能临床团队。
Qual Prim Care. 2011;19(1):13-22.
10
Validity and usefulness of members reports of implementation progress in a quality improvement initiative: findings from the Team Check-up Tool (TCT).成员报告在质量改进计划中的实施进展的有效性和实用性：来自团队检查工具（TCT）的发现。
Implement Sci. 2011 Oct 3;6:115. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-115.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying potential outcomes of patient engagement in primary care quality improvement: a modified Delphi study.确定患者参与初级保健质量改进的潜在结果：一项改良的德尔菲研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Apr;31(3):e14199. doi: 10.1111/jep.14199. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知：一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Engaging Patients at the Front Lines of Primary Care Redesign: Operational Lessons for an Effective Program.让患者参与基层医疗服务重新设计的前线工作：有效项目的运营经验
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Dec;40(12):533-40. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40069-2.
2
Survey shows that fewer than a third of patient-centered medical home practices engage patients in quality improvement.调查显示，参与以患者为中心的医疗之家实践的患者中，参与质量改进的不到三分之一。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):368-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1183.
3
Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.
Developing catalyst films of health experiences: an analysis of a robust multi-stakeholder involvement journey.
开发健康体验的催化剂薄膜：对一个稳健的多利益相关者参与过程的分析。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Jul 29;8(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00369-3.
4
Co-produced capability framework for successful patient and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: results of a scoping review.共同制定能力框架，以成功建立医疗保健质量改进中的患者和员工伙伴关系：范围综述的结果。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Feb;31(2):134-146. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012729. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
5
Optimizing patient partnership in primary care improvement: A qualitative study.优化初级保健改进中的患者伙伴关系：一项定性研究。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2021;46(2):123-134. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000250.
6
Building the learning health system: Describing an organizational infrastructure to support continuous learning.构建学习型健康系统：描述支持持续学习的组织架构
Learn Health Syst. 2017 Jul 12;1(4):e10034. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10034. eCollection 2017 Oct.
7
Engaging Patients in Primary Care Quality Improvement Initiatives: Facilitators and Barriers.参与初级保健质量改进计划的患者：促进因素和障碍。
Am J Med Qual. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):52-62. doi: 10.1177/1062860619842938. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
8
Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach.培养有能力提升医疗质量的基层医疗团队：一项混合方法评估及实施微观系统方法的经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 9;18(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3650-4.
9
'Adding another spinning plate to an already busy life Benefits and risks in patient partner-researcher relationships: a qualitative study of patient partners' experiences in a Canadian health research setting.在已然忙碌的生活中增添另一个旋转的盘子：患者-伙伴-研究者关系中的益处与风险：对加拿大健康研究环境下患者伙伴经历的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e022154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022154.
10
Pharmacy and nursing students' attitudes toward nurse-pharmacist collaboration at a Chinese university.中国某高校药学和护理专业学生对护药合作的态度。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 2;18(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1285-0.
患者和家属参与：理解要素、制定干预措施和政策的框架。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):223-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133.
4
AM last page: A snapshot of three common program evaluation approaches for medical education.最后一页：医学教育三种常见项目评估方法概述。
Acad Med. 2013 Jan;88(1):146. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182759419.
5
Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care.共同决策——以患者为中心的医疗的巅峰。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):780-1. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1109283.
6
Quality improvement implementation and disparities: the case of the health disparities collaboratives.质量改进实施与差异：以健康差异合作组织为例。
Med Care. 2011 Dec;49 Suppl:S65-71. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31823ea0da.
7
Despite improved quality of care in the Veterans Affairs health system, racial disparity persists for important clinical outcomes.尽管退伍军人事务部医疗体系的护理质量有所提高，但在一些重要的临床结果方面，仍存在种族差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):707-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0074.
8
Methods for evaluating practice change toward a patient-centered medical home.评估以患者为中心的医疗之家实践变革的方法。
Ann Fam Med. 2010;8 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S9-20; S92. doi: 10.1370/afm.1108.
9
The Group Health medical home at year two: cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers.两年后的团体健康医疗之家：为提供者节省成本、提高患者满意度和减少倦怠感。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 May;29(5):835-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0158.
10
Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation.以患者为中心的医疗之家示范：前瞻性、准实验、前后评估。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Sep 1;15(9):e71-87.