• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠心病门诊患者中颈动脉疾病的患病率

Prevalence of Carotid Artery Disease among Ambulatory Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

作者信息

Kazum Shirit, Eisen Alon, Lev Eli I, Iakobishvili Zaza, Solodky Alejandro, Hasdai David, Kornowski Ran, Mager Aviv

出版信息

Isr Med Assoc J. 2016 Feb;18(2):100-3.

PMID:26979002
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concomitant carotid artery disease (CaAD) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with worse cardiac and neurologic outcomes. The reported prevalence and risk factors for concomitant CaAD in CAD patients varied among previous studies.

OBJECTIVES

To examine these factors in ambulatory patients with CAD and well-documented cholesterol levels treated with cholesterol-lowering medications.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 325 unselected patients with CAD (89 women, mean age 68.8 ± 9.9 years) undergoing routine evaluation at the coronary clinic of our hospital.

RESULTS

The low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) was < 100 mg/dl in 292 patients (90%). Age at onset of CAD symptoms was 59.4 ± 10.8 years. Carotid stenosis ≥ 50% was seen in 83 patients (25.5%) and between 30% and 49% in 55 patients (17%) (duplex method). Carotid stenosis was significantly associated with hypertension (P = 0.032), peripheral arterial disease (P = 0.002) and number of coronary arteries with ≥ 50% stenosis (P = 0.002), and showed a borderline association with age at CAD onset (P = 0.062) and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.053). On linear regression analysis, independent predictors of CaAD were peripheral vascular disease (OR 3.186, 95% CI 1.403-7.236, P = 0.006), number of coronary arteries with ≥ 50% stenosis (OR 1.543, 95% CI 1.136-2.095, P = 0.005), and age at CAD onset (OR 1.028, 95% CI 1.002-1.054, P = 0.003). None of the variables studied predicted freedom from CaAD.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid atherosclerosis is very common in stable ambulatory patients with CAD regularly taking statins. The risk is higher in patients with peripheral arterial disease, a greater number of involved coronary arteries, and older age at onset of CAD.

摘要

背景

冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者合并颈动脉疾病(CaAD)与更差的心脏和神经学预后相关。既往研究中,CAD患者合并CaAD的报道患病率及危险因素各不相同。

目的

在接受降胆固醇药物治疗且胆固醇水平记录良好的门诊CAD患者中研究这些因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了前瞻性收集的来自我院冠心病门诊325例未经选择的CAD患者(89例女性,平均年龄68.8±9.9岁)的数据。

结果

292例患者(90%)的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)<100mg/dl。CAD症状发作时的年龄为59.4±10.8岁。83例患者(25.5%)出现颈动脉狭窄≥50%,55例患者(17%)出现30%至49%的狭窄(采用双功超声法)。颈动脉狭窄与高血压(P=0.032)、外周动脉疾病(P=0.002)以及≥50%狭窄的冠状动脉数量(P=0.002)显著相关,与CAD发病年龄(P=0.062)和糖尿病(P=0.053)呈临界相关。在线性回归分析中,CaAD的独立预测因素为外周血管疾病(OR 3.186,95%CI 1.403-7.236,P=0.006)、≥50%狭窄的冠状动脉数量(OR 1.543,95%CI 1.136-2.095,P=0.005)以及CAD发病年龄(OR 1.028,95%CI 1.002-1.054,P=0.003)。所研究的变量均未预测无CaAD情况。

结论

在规律服用他汀类药物的稳定门诊CAD患者中,颈动脉粥样硬化非常常见。在外周动脉疾病患者、累及冠状动脉数量较多的患者以及CAD发病年龄较大的患者中风险更高。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Carotid Artery Disease among Ambulatory Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.冠心病门诊患者中颈动脉疾病的患病率
Isr Med Assoc J. 2016 Feb;18(2):100-3.
2
Co-existence of carotid artery disease, renal artery stenosis, and lower extremity peripheral arterial disease in patients with coronary artery disease.冠心病患者颈动脉疾病、肾动脉狭窄和下肢外周动脉疾病共存。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 1;113(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
3
Progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis despite optimal medical therapy.尽管进行了最佳药物治疗,无症状颈动脉狭窄仍在进展。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):128-35.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.04.002.
4
Prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus and its correlation with coronary artery disease and its risk factors.2型糖尿病患者外周动脉疾病的患病率及其与冠状动脉疾病及其危险因素的相关性。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2012 Jul;60:28-32.
5
Disparities in lipid control and statin drug use among diabetics with noncoronary atherosclerotic vascular disease vs those with coronary artery disease.非冠状动脉粥样硬化性血管疾病的糖尿病患者与冠状动脉疾病患者在血脂控制和他汀类药物使用方面的差异。
J Clin Lipidol. 2015 Mar-Apr;9(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
6
Prevalence of hypoechoic carotid plaques in coronary artery disease: relationship with coexistent peripheral arterial disease and leukocyte number.冠状动脉疾病中低回声颈动脉斑块的患病率:与并存的外周动脉疾病及白细胞数量的关系
Vasc Med. 2009 Feb;14(1):13-9. doi: 10.1177/1358863X08097066.
7
Impact of coronary computed tomographic angiography findings on the medical treatment and control of coronary artery disease and its risk factors.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影结果对冠状动脉疾病及其危险因素的药物治疗和控制的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Oct 1;104(7):873-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.05.024.
8
Prevalence and predictors of concomitant carotid and coronary artery atherosclerotic disease.同时存在的颈动脉和冠状动脉粥样硬化性疾病的流行情况及其预测因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 15;57(7):779-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.047.
9
The frequency and risk of preclinical coronary artery disease detected using multichannel cardiac computed tomography in patients with ischemic stroke.多通道心脏计算机断层扫描在缺血性脑卒中患者中检测到的临床前冠状动脉疾病的频率和风险。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012;33(3):286-94. doi: 10.1159/000334980. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
10
Risk factors for carotid artery disease in patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting.拟行冠状动脉旁路移植术患者颈动脉疾病的危险因素。
Kardiol Pol. 2010 Jul;68(7):789-94.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-cell transcriptomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic characterization of human atherosclerosis.人类动脉粥样硬化的单细胞转录组学、转录组学和代谢组学特征分析
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Nov;10(22):1215. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-4852.
2
Phenotypic Disease Network Analysis to Identify Comorbidity Patterns in Hospitalized Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease Using Large-Scale Administrative Data.使用大规模管理数据进行表型疾病网络分析以识别缺血性心脏病住院患者的共病模式
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 1;10(1):80. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010080.
3
Validation of Risk Prediction Models to Detect Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.
验证用于检测无症状颈动脉狭窄的风险预测模型。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 21;9(8):e014766. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014766. Epub 2020 Apr 20.