Suppr超能文献

广泛性与功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术治疗伴鼻息肉和哮喘的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎:一项为期1年的研究。

Extensive versus functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and asthma: A 1-year study.

作者信息

Chen Feng-Hong, Deng Jie, Hong Hai-Yu, Xu Rui, Guo Jie-Bo, Hou Wei-Jian, Sun Yue-Qi, Lai Yin-Yan, Li Hua-Bin, Shi Jian-Bo

机构信息

Allergy and Cancer Center, Otorhinolaryngology Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016 Mar-Apr;30(2):143-8. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2016.30.4271.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is considered to be the standard procedure for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, for CRSwNP that accompanies asthma, the results are not satisfying. Extensive endoscopic sinus surgery (EESS) aimed at reducing the inflammatory load has been indicated as a viable option for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and safety of EESS (middle turbinate and superior turbinate resection and total ethmoidectomy) for patients with CRSwNP and with asthma.

METHODS

This was a prospective, single-institute cohort study conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients with CRSwNP and with asthma who were proceeding to surgery were enrolled. There were 23 patients in the EESS group and 24 patients in the FESS group. The preoperative disease severity was evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS), Lund-Kennedy (L-K) endoscopy score, computed tomography Lund-Mackay score, asthma control test (ACT), and pulmonary function test. Clinical outcomes were comparatively evaluated between the two groups after a 1-year follow-up by using the VAS score, the postoperative endoscopic score (E score), L-K score, ACT score, and pulmonary function test.

RESULTS

The disease severity (general VAS score, endoscopic L-K score, computed tomography score, ACT score) showed no significant differences between the two groups before surgery (p > 0.05). One year after surgery, both groups achieved significant improvement in the VAS score and endoscopic L-K score. The EESS group showed better improvement in the olfactory VAS score and E score compared with the FESS group (mean [standard deviation] change of olfactory VAS, 6.00 ± 3.67 versus 3.30 ± 3.44, p = 0.015; mean [standard deviation] E score, 0.31 ± 0.18 versus 0.66 ± 0.26, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the change of general nasal symptom VAS score, other individual VAS scores (nasal congestion, discharge, headache and/or facial pain), L-K score, ACT score, and pulmonary function between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

EESS for patients with CRSwNP and with asthma may help to improve the subjective olfaction and endoscopic appearance.

摘要

背景

功能性鼻内镜鼻窦手术(FESS)被认为是慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的标准术式。然而,对于合并哮喘的CRSwNP患者,手术效果并不理想。旨在减轻炎症负荷的广泛鼻内镜鼻窦手术(EESS)已被视为难治性慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的一种可行选择。

目的

评估EESS(中鼻甲和上鼻甲切除及全筛窦切除术)治疗CRSwNP合并哮喘患者的临床疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项在三级教学医院进行的前瞻性单中心队列研究。纳入拟行手术治疗的CRSwNP合并哮喘患者。EESS组23例患者,FESS组24例患者。术前采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Lund-Kennedy(L-K)内镜评分、计算机断层扫描Lund-Mackay评分、哮喘控制测试(ACT)和肺功能测试评估疾病严重程度。随访1年后,采用VAS评分、术后内镜评分(E评分)、L-K评分、ACT评分和肺功能测试对两组的临床疗效进行比较评估。

结果

术前两组疾病严重程度(总体VAS评分、内镜L-K评分、计算机断层扫描评分、ACT评分)差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。术后1年,两组VAS评分和内镜L-K评分均显著改善。与FESS组相比,EESS组嗅觉VAS评分和E评分改善更明显(嗅觉VAS评分平均[标准差]变化:6.00±3.67比3.30±3.44,p=0.015;E评分平均[标准差]:0.31±0.18比0.66±0.26,p<0.001)。两组总体鼻症状VAS评分、其他单项VAS评分(鼻塞、流涕、头痛和/或面部疼痛)、L-K评分、ACT评分和肺功能变化差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

EESS治疗CRSwNP合并哮喘患者可能有助于改善主观嗅觉和内镜表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验