Suppr超能文献

停用抗精神病药物治疗精神病的个人记录。

Personal Accounts of Discontinuing Neuroleptic Medication for Psychosis.

作者信息

Geyt Gabrielle Le, Awenat Yvonne, Tai Sara, Haddock Gillian

机构信息

1 University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

2 North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust, Newcastle, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2017 Mar;27(4):559-572. doi: 10.1177/1049732316634047. Epub 2016 Jul 9.

Abstract

We conducted this study to explore personal accounts of making choices about taking medication prescribed for the treatment of psychosis (neuroleptics). There are costs and benefits associated with continuing and discontinuing neuroleptics. Service users frequently discontinue neuroleptics; therefore, we specifically considered these decisions. We used a grounded theory approach to analyze transcripts from interviews with 12 participants. We present a preliminary grounded theory of the processes involved in making choices about neuroleptic medication. We identified three tasks as important in mediating participants' choices: (a) forming a personal theory of the need for, and acceptability of taking, neuroleptic medication; (b) negotiating the challenges of forming alliances with others; and (c) weaving a safety net to safeguard well-being. Progress in the tasks reflected a developmental trajectory of becoming an expert over time and was influenced by systemic factors. Our findings highlight the importance of developing resources for staff to facilitate service user choice.

摘要

我们开展这项研究,旨在探究关于选择服用治疗精神病药物(抗精神病药)的个人叙述。继续和停用抗精神病药都存在成本与益处。服务使用者经常停用抗精神病药;因此,我们特别考量了这些决定。我们采用扎根理论方法,分析了对12名参与者访谈的文字记录。我们提出了一个关于选择抗精神病药物过程的初步扎根理论。我们确定了三项在调解参与者选择方面很重要的任务:(a) 形成关于服用抗精神病药物的必要性和可接受性的个人理论;(b) 应对与他人结成联盟的挑战;(c) 编织一张安全网以保障福祉。这些任务的进展反映了随着时间推移成为专家的发展轨迹,并受到系统因素的影响。我们的研究结果凸显了为工作人员开发资源以促进服务使用者选择的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验