Suppr超能文献

经皮股动脉入路在儿科介入性心导管术中的应用。

Percutaneous Common Carotid Artery Access for Pediatric Interventional Cardiac Catheterization.

机构信息

From the C.E. Mullins Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories, Texas Children's Hospital (H.J.); Lillie Frank Abercrombie Section of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (H.J.); and Division of Cardiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University School of Medicine, GA (C.J.P.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Apr;9(4):e003003. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Surgical cutdown for access to the common carotid artery provides a more direct route for certain pediatric cardiac interventions and avoids femoral artery injury in small infants. The safety of percutaneous carotid access (PCA) in children is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Retrospective review of PCA at Texas Children's Hospital and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta. From July 2006 to November 2014, 42 patients underwent 47 attempts at catheterization via PCA. Median (range) age was 20 days (0 days-2.9 years) and weight was 3.2 kg (1.1-12.2). Two patients had failed PCA with no sequelae. Of the 45 catheterizations with successful PCA and sheath placement, 44 interventions were performed, the most common being stenting or stent redilation of the ductus arteriosus, balloon aortic valvuloplasty, and stenting or angioplasty of Blalock-Taussig shunts. After sheath withdrawal, hemostasis was achieved with manual compression, with no need for surgical control of bleeding. Follow-up carotid imaging was performed in all. Acutely, 3 patients developed carotid thrombosis with resolution in 1 and mild residual narrowing in 2 after anticoagulation therapy. At follow-up, 40 of 42 patients (95%) had a normal carotid artery, with 2 instances of mild stenosis. There were no neurological sequelae attributable to PCA.

CONCLUSIONS

PCA is safe even in small infants, and hemostasis can be achieved without surgical repair, with a carotid patency rate superior to published data after surgical cutdown. Surgical cutdown is not routinely required for pediatric cardiac catheterization via the carotid artery.

摘要

背景

为了进行某些儿科心脏介入治疗,并避免小婴儿的股动脉损伤,手术切开显露颈总动脉为获取通路提供了更直接的途径。经皮颈动脉入路(PCA)在儿童中的安全性尚不清楚。

方法和结果

对德克萨斯儿童医院和亚特兰大儿童保健中心的 PCA 进行回顾性分析。2006 年 7 月至 2014 年 11 月,42 例患者进行了 47 次经 PCA 导管插入术尝试。中位(范围)年龄为 20 天(0 天-2.9 岁),体重为 3.2 公斤(1.1-12.2)。2 例患者因 PCA 失败且无后遗症。45 例成功进行 PCA 和鞘管放置的导管插入术中,44 例介入治疗,最常见的是动脉导管支架置入或支架扩张、球囊主动脉瓣成形术以及 Blalock-Taussig 分流的支架置入或血管成形术。鞘管拔出后,采用手动压迫止血,无需手术控制出血。所有患者均进行了颈动脉影像学随访。急性时,3 例患者发生颈动脉血栓形成,1 例经抗凝治疗后血栓溶解,2 例仍有轻度残留狭窄。随访时,42 例患者中有 40 例(95%)颈动脉正常,2 例有轻度狭窄。无 PCA 引起的神经后遗症。

结论

即使在小婴儿中,PCA 也是安全的,且无需手术修复即可止血,其通畅率优于经手术切开显露颈总动脉后的文献报道数据。经皮颈动脉入路进行儿科心导管术通常不需要手术切开显露颈总动脉。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验