Shin Yu Rim, Jung Jo Won, Kim Nam Kyun, Choi Jae Young, Kim Young Jin, Shin Hong Ju, Park Young-Hwan, Park Han Ki
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Sep;50(3):464-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw049. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
Although progressive right ventricular (RV) enlargement (RVE) is common in patients with pulmonary regurgitation after tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair, the rate of RVE and progression of RV dysfunction varies among patients. The present study aimed to investigate the independent predictors of rapid RVE and RV dysfunction after the repair of TOF, using serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
The study included consecutive patients who underwent serial cardiac MRI more than twice between January 2005 and March 2015 after the repair of TOF. Patients who underwent surgical pulmonary valve implantation or any transcatheter cardiac intervention between two consecutive MRI assessments were excluded. The study patients were divided into rapid RVE and non-rapid RVE groups according to the rate of RVE. The upper first quartile of the patients was considered to have rapid RV dilatation (defined as rapid RVE group). Remaining patients in other three quartiles were included in the non-rapid RVE group. Additionally, the study patients were divided into rapid right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) change and non-rapid RVEF change groups according to the rate of change in the RVEF. The groups were compared, and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for rapid RVE and RV dysfunction.
The study included 116 patients. The mean number of cardiac MRI assessments performed in each patient was 2.8 ± 0.8. The time to the initial MRI assessment after TOF repair was 14.2 ± 10.3 years, and the interval between the initial and last MRI assessments was 4.5 ± 2.2 years. The mean right ventricular end-diastolic volume index (RVEDVi) change rate was 2.7 ± 6.1 ml/m(2)/year. The initial RVEDVi was not different between the rapid RVE and non-rapid RVE groups. Restrictive RV physiology was an independent risk factor for rapid RVE (odds ratio, 3.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.263-10.494; P = 0.02), and a previous palliative shunt procedure was a negative predictor for rapid RVE (odds ratio, 0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.010-0.778; P = 0.03). We did not find any predictive factors for rapid RV dysfunction.
In patients with rapid RV dilatation, restrictive RV physiology might be frequently noted at the initial MRI assessment. Therefore, careful follow-up may be necessary in patients with restrictive RV physiology to determine the optimal timing of pulmonary valve implantation.
尽管法洛四联症(TOF)修复术后肺动脉反流患者中进行性右心室(RV)扩大(RVE)很常见,但RVE的发生率和RV功能障碍的进展在患者中各不相同。本研究旨在使用系列心脏磁共振成像(MRI)研究TOF修复术后快速RVE和RV功能障碍的独立预测因素。
该研究纳入了2005年1月至2015年3月期间TOF修复术后接受两次以上系列心脏MRI检查的连续患者。排除在两次连续MRI评估之间接受外科肺动脉瓣植入或任何经导管心脏介入治疗的患者。根据RVE的发生率将研究患者分为快速RVE组和非快速RVE组。患者的上四分位数被认为有快速RV扩张(定义为快速RVE组)。其他三个四分位数中的其余患者纳入非快速RVE组。此外,根据右心室射血分数(RVEF)的变化率将研究患者分为快速RVEF变化组和非快速RVEF变化组。对各组进行比较,并进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定快速RVE和RV功能障碍的独立危险因素。
该研究纳入了116例患者。每位患者进行心脏MRI评估的平均次数为2.8±0.8次。TOF修复术后至首次MRI评估的时间为14.2±10.3年,首次和最后一次MRI评估之间的间隔为4.5±2.2年。右心室舒张末期容积指数(RVEDVi)的平均变化率为2.7±6.1 ml/m²/年。快速RVE组和非快速RVE组之间的初始RVEDVi无差异。限制性RV生理是快速RVE的独立危险因素(比值比,3.64;95%置信区间,1.263 - 10.494;P = 0.02),既往姑息性分流手术是快速RVE的负性预测因素(比值比,0.08;95%置信区间,0.010 - 0.778;P = 0.03)。我们未发现快速RV功能障碍的任何预测因素。
在快速RV扩张的患者中,在首次MRI评估时可能经常注意到限制性RV生理。因此,对于有限制性RV生理的患者可能需要仔细随访,以确定肺动脉瓣植入的最佳时机。