• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估务虚会:一种合理的项目评估方法。

EVALUATION RETREAT: A SENSIBLE METHOD FOR PROGRAM'S ASSESSMENT.

作者信息

Rios R, Estapé E, Díaz C, Segarra B, Martin M San

机构信息

University of Puerto Rico, School of Public Health (PUERTO RICO).

University of Puerto Rico-School of Health Professions (PUERTO RICO).

出版信息

INTED Proc. 2015 Mar;2015:7577-7584.

PMID:26985449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4791064/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The University of Puerto Rico (UPR), Medical Sciences Campus (MSC) post-doctoral Master of Science in Clinical and Translational Research (MSc) program aims to train Hispanic post-doctoral candidates to advance their careers and become successful clinical and translational researchers geared to help eliminate health disparities. Its curriculum highlights the use of technology and online resources to maximize time use of time and efforts. As part of the assessment efforts, the program's Evaluation Committee leads an annual activity, Evaluation Retreat (ER), to evaluate the program's curriculum, research component, and mentoring experience according to Scholars' perspective. Results are used by the Program Executive committee for further planning and improvement. This analysis presents the most relevant results from these activities.

DESIGN METHODS

Data collection (from last 5 years), include quantitative (online surveys) and qualitative approaches (a group meeting with Scholars.) Questionnaires request Scholars to rate specific features of the program's research component, mentoring experience and curriculum. It also includes questions about the program in general (major strengths and challenges, and recommendations for improvement. During the group meeting, Scholars discuss these results and present consensus in a plenary session. Quantitative data are managed and analyzed using the statistical software SPSS. Qualitative data are examined using content analysis.

RESULTS

Scholars identified as program's strengths the networking opportunities (local and with U.S. experts), the diversity of peers and faculty, the faculty support, the technical and audiovisual support, the physical facilities and resources, the guest speakers and consultants, and the quality of the curriculum. Challenges vary as cohorts change, but time limitations and the need for technical/statistical support are always highlighted. Recommendations for improvement emphasize the need for a greater pool of experienced mentors, and more hands-on approaches to address particular skills such as, manuscript development, institutional and federal guidelines for proposal submission, and issues related to the research project management.

DISCUSSION

Evaluation Retreats provide a valuable input to improve a program geared to develop competent clinical researchers. Findings evidence the program's commitment with providing the foundation for an enhanced mass of clinical researchers.

摘要

目的

波多黎各大学(UPR)医学科学园区(MSC)临床与转化研究理学硕士博士后项目旨在培养西班牙裔博士后候选人,推动其职业发展,使其成为致力于消除健康差距的成功临床与转化研究人员。其课程强调利用技术和在线资源,以最大限度地利用时间和精力。作为评估工作的一部分,该项目的评估委员会每年举办一次活动,即评估务虚会(ER),从学者的角度评估项目的课程、研究部分和指导经验。项目执行委员会利用这些结果进行进一步规划和改进。本分析展示了这些活动中最相关的结果。

设计方法

数据收集(过去5年)包括定量方法(在线调查)和定性方法(与学者进行小组会议)。问卷要求学者对项目研究部分、指导经验和课程的具体特征进行评分。还包括关于项目总体情况的问题(主要优势和挑战以及改进建议)。在小组会议期间,学者们讨论这些结果,并在全体会议上达成共识。定量数据使用统计软件SPSS进行管理和分析。定性数据采用内容分析法进行审查。

结果

学者们将网络机会(本地和与美国专家的交流)、同行和教师的多样性、教师支持、技术和视听支持、实体设施和资源、客座演讲者和顾问以及课程质量视为项目的优势。挑战因学员群体的变化而有所不同,但时间限制以及对技术/统计支持的需求始终被突出强调。改进建议强调需要更多有经验的导师,以及采用更具实践性的方法来解决特定技能问题,如论文撰写、机构和联邦提案提交指南以及与研究项目管理相关的问题。

讨论

评估务虚会为改进一个旨在培养合格临床研究人员的项目提供了宝贵的意见。研究结果证明该项目致力于为培养更多临床研究人员奠定基础。

相似文献

1
EVALUATION RETREAT: A SENSIBLE METHOD FOR PROGRAM'S ASSESSMENT.评估务虚会:一种合理的项目评估方法。
INTED Proc. 2015 Mar;2015:7577-7584.
2
Embarking on a Journey of Discovery: Developing Transitional Skill Sets through a Scholarly Concentration Program.踏上发现之旅:通过学术集中计划培养过渡技能。
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Apr-May;31(2):195-206. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2018.1490184. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
3
A New Master's Degree in Global Health: Reflections on a 5-year Experience.全球健康新硕士学位:5 年经验反思。
Ann Glob Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;81(5):618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.10.006.
4
Designing a National Longitudinal Faculty Development Curriculum Focused on Educational Scholarship: Process, Outcomes, and Lessons Learned.设计一门聚焦于教育学术的全国性纵向教师发展课程:过程、成果及经验教训
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;29(3):337-350. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1282370. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
5
Increasing research capacity in community organizations: Findings from the Community Research Scholars Initiative.提高社区组织的研究能力:社区研究学者计划的研究结果。
Eval Program Plann. 2023 Feb;96:102189. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102189. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
6
Developing the master educator: cross disciplinary teaching scholars program for human and veterinary medical faculty.培养主教育者:面向人类医学和兽医学教师的跨学科教学学者项目
Acad Psychiatry. 2007 Nov-Dec;31(6):452-64. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.6.452.
7
Broadening measures of success: results of a behavioral health translational research training program.拓宽成功的衡量标准:一项行为健康转化研究培训计划的成果。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jul 24;12(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0621-9.
8
Education to improve cancer care in rural South Australia.改善南澳大利亚农村地区癌症护理的教育。
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1147. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
9
The impact of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholars Program on scholars, schools and nursing science.罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会护理学者未来计划对学者、院校及护理科学的影响。
Nurs Outlook. 2023 Jan-Feb;71(1):101906. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.12.002. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
BUILDing SCHOLARS: enhancing diversity among U.S. biomedical researchers in the Southwest.培养学者:增强美国西南部生物医学研究人员的多样性。
BMC Proc. 2017 Dec 4;11(Suppl 12):12. doi: 10.1186/s12919-017-0095-4. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Areas of strength and opportunities for growth in translational science education and training: Results of a scoping review from the NCATS Education Branch.转化科学教育和培训的优势领域和增长机会:来自 NCATS 教育处的范围综述结果。
Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Sep;16(9):1526-1546. doi: 10.1111/cts.13570. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Incorporating translational research with clinical research to increase effectiveness in healthcare for better health.将转化研究与临床研究相结合,提高医疗保健的效果,以改善健康。
Clin Transl Med. 2014 Jul 5;3:20. doi: 10.1186/2001-1326-3-20. eCollection 2014.
2
Shaping a new generation of Hispanic clinical and translational researchers addressing minority health and health disparities.塑造新一代致力于解决少数族裔健康和健康差距问题的西班牙裔临床与转化研究人员。
P R Health Sci J. 2011 Dec;30(4):167-75.
3
Defining translational research: implications for training.定义转化研究:对培训的启示。
Acad Med. 2010 Mar;85(3):470-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ccd618.
4
Practice-based research--"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap.基于实践的研究——美国国立卫生研究院路线图上的“蓝色高速公路”。
JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):403-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.4.403.