Giammanco A, Vieu J F, Bouvet P J, Sarzana A, Sinatra A
Institute of Microbiology, University of Palermo, Italy.
Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1989 Dec;272(2):231-41. doi: 10.1016/s0934-8840(89)80012-x.
A comparative assay for epidemiological evaluation of three different Acinetobacter typing procedures, i.e. biotyping, phage-typing, and the analysis of the bacterial envelope protein profiles, was carried out using sixty-four multiresistant Acinetobacter strains isolated from clinical specimens. The antibiotic susceptibility of the strains was also considered. After geno-species identification, biotyping allowed the recognition of a relatively large and long-lasting presence, at an Intensive Therapy Unit, of two A. baumannii biotypes. Phage-typing and the analysis of the susceptibility to antibiotics allowed for the differentiation of strains belonging to different geno-species and biotypes, and in some cases also to the same biotypes. On the contrary, the analysis by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the cell-envelope proteins failed to show any diversity not only within, but also between some of the biotypes of A. baumannii, the most prevalent species of the genus in the hospital environment.
利用从临床标本中分离出的64株多重耐药不动杆菌菌株,对三种不同的不动杆菌分型方法(即生物分型、噬菌体分型和细菌包膜蛋白谱分析)进行了流行病学评估的比较检测。还考虑了这些菌株的抗生素敏感性。在进行基因种属鉴定后,生物分型能够识别出在一个重症监护病房中,两种鲍曼不动杆菌生物型存在的时间相对较长且数量较多。噬菌体分型和抗生素敏感性分析能够区分属于不同基因种属和生物型的菌株,在某些情况下,也能区分属于同一生物型的菌株。相反,通过聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳对细胞包膜蛋白进行分析,不仅未能在鲍曼不动杆菌(医院环境中该属最常见的菌种)的某些生物型内部,而且也未能在它们之间显示出任何差异。