Suppr超能文献

误导性形态以及对解决珊瑚藻分类学(珊瑚藻目,红藻门)而言测序模式标本的重要性:白垩厚节藻实则为药用珊瑚藻。

Misleading morphologies and the importance of sequencing type specimens for resolving coralline taxonomy (Corallinales, Rhodophyta): Pachyarthron cretaceum is Corallina officinalis.

作者信息

Hind Katharine R, Gabrielson Paul W, Lindstrom Sandra C, Martone Patrick T

机构信息

Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 1Z4.

Herbarium and Biology Department, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Coker Hall, CB 3280, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-3280, USA.

出版信息

J Phycol. 2014 Aug;50(4):760-4. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12205. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

Abstract

Coralline red algae play a key role in the ecology of near shore marine ecosystems and are increasingly being used to study the effects of climate change in the marine environment. Corallines are very difficult to identify to species, and even to genus, using morpho-anatomy, likely complicating studies of their ecology, physiology, and biodiversity. We sequenced a 296 base pair fragment of chloroplast DNA from a 187-year-old isolectotype specimen of Pachyarthron cretaceum, a morphologically distinct geniculate species, to demonstrate that coralline morphology is often misleading and that species names can only be applied unequivocally by comparing DNA sequences from type material with sequences from field-collected specimens. Our results indicate that Pachyarthron cretaceum is synonymous with Corallina officinalis.

摘要

珊瑚藻在近岸海洋生态系统的生态学中起着关键作用,并且越来越多地被用于研究气候变化对海洋环境的影响。仅通过形态解剖学方法,很难将珊瑚藻鉴定到物种,甚至属,这可能会使它们的生态学、生理学和生物多样性研究变得复杂。我们对一种形态独特的膝曲状物种——白垩厚节藻(Pachyarthron cretaceum)的187年历史的等模式标本的叶绿体DNA的296个碱基对片段进行了测序,以证明珊瑚藻的形态常常具有误导性,并且只有通过将模式标本的DNA序列与野外采集标本的序列进行比较,才能明确应用物种名称。我们的结果表明,白垩厚节藻与药用珊瑚藻(Corallina officinalis)是同物异名。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验