Hughey Jeffery R, Gabrielson Paul W, Rohmer Laurence, Tortolani Jacquie, Silva Mayra, Miller Kathy Ann, Young Joel D, Martell Craig, Ruediger Erik
Division of Mathematics, Science, and Engineering, Hartnell College, 411 Central Ave., Salinas, California 93901, USA.
Herbarium and Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, CB# 3280, Coker Hall, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA.
Sci Rep. 2014 Jun 4;4:5113. doi: 10.1038/srep05113.
Plant species, including algae and fungi, are based on type specimens to which the name of a taxon is permanently attached. Applying a scientific name to any specimen therefore requires demonstrating correspondence between the type and that specimen. Traditionally, identifications are based on morpho-anatomical characters, but recently systematists are using DNA sequence data. These studies are flawed if the DNA is isolated from misidentified modern specimens. We propose a genome-based solution. Using 4 × 4 mm(2) of material from type specimens, we assembled 14 plastid and 15 mitochondrial genomes attributed to the red algae Pyropia perforata, Py. fucicola, and Py. kanakaensis. The chloroplast genomes were fairly conserved, but the mitochondrial genomes differed significantly among populations in content and length. Complete genomes are attainable from 19(th) and early 20(th) century type specimens; this validates the effort and cost of their curation as well as supports the practice of the type method.
包括藻类和真菌在内的植物物种都基于模式标本,分类单元的名称永久附着于这些标本上。因此,将科学名称应用于任何标本都需要证明该标本与模式标本之间的对应关系。传统上,鉴定基于形态解剖特征,但最近系统学家开始使用DNA序列数据。如果从错误鉴定的现代标本中分离DNA,这些研究就会存在缺陷。我们提出了一种基于基因组的解决方案。我们使用来自模式标本的4×4平方毫米的材料,组装了14个质体基因组和15个线粒体基因组,这些基因组分别属于红藻孔石莼、鹿角石莼和卡纳卡石莼。叶绿体基因组相当保守,但线粒体基因组在不同种群之间的含量和长度存在显著差异。从19世纪和20世纪初的模式标本中可以获得完整的基因组;这证实了对它们进行保存的努力和成本,并支持了模式标本方法的实践。