United States Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, 20770, USA.
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Oct;22(10):3273-85. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13283. Epub 2016 May 12.
There is intense interest in basic and applied ecology about the effect of global change on current and future species distributions. Projections based on widely used static modeling methods implicitly assume that species are in equilibrium with the environment and that detection during surveys is perfect. We used multiseason correlated detection occupancy models, which avoid these assumptions, to relate climate data to distributional shifts of Louisiana Waterthrush in the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) data. We summarized these shifts with indices of range size and position and compared them to the same indices obtained using more basic modeling approaches. Detection rates during point counts in BBS surveys were low, and models that ignored imperfect detection severely underestimated the proportion of area occupied and slightly overestimated mean latitude. Static models indicated Louisiana Waterthrush distribution was most closely associated with moderate temperatures, while dynamic occupancy models indicated that initial occupancy was associated with diurnal temperature ranges and colonization of sites was associated with moderate precipitation. Overall, the proportion of area occupied and mean latitude changed little during the 1997-2013 study period. Near-term forecasts of species distribution generated by dynamic models were more similar to subsequently observed distributions than forecasts from static models. Occupancy models incorporating a finite mixture model on detection - a new extension to correlated detection occupancy models - were better supported and may reduce bias associated with detection heterogeneity. We argue that replacing phenomenological static models with more mechanistic dynamic models can improve projections of future species distributions. In turn, better projections can improve biodiversity forecasts, management decisions, and understanding of global change biology.
人们对全球变化如何影响当前和未来物种分布非常感兴趣,这在基础生态学和应用生态学领域引发了广泛关注。基于广泛应用的静态建模方法的预测隐含地假设物种与环境处于平衡状态,并且调查期间的检测是完美的。我们使用了多季节相关检测占用模型,这些模型避免了这些假设,从而将气候数据与路易斯安那州水鸟在北美繁殖鸟类调查(BBS)数据中的分布变化联系起来。我们使用范围大小和位置的指数来总结这些变化,并将其与使用更基本建模方法获得的相同指数进行比较。BBS 调查中的点计数期间的检测率较低,忽略不完全检测的模型严重低估了占用面积的比例,并略微高估了平均纬度。静态模型表明,路易斯安那州水鸟的分布与中等温度最密切相关,而动态占用模型则表明,初始占用与昼夜温度范围有关,而站点的殖民化与中等降水有关。总体而言,在 1997 年至 2013 年的研究期间,占用面积的比例和平均纬度变化不大。动态模型生成的物种分布的短期预测与随后观察到的分布更为相似,而静态模型的预测则不同。包含检测上有限混合模型的占用模型——这是相关检测占用模型的新扩展——得到了更好的支持,并且可能会减少与检测异质性相关的偏差。我们认为,用更机械的动态模型代替现象学静态模型可以提高未来物种分布的预测。反过来,更好的预测可以提高生物多样性预测、管理决策和对全球变化生物学的理解。