Scherhag A, Klein A, Jantzen J P
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz.
Anaesthesist. 1989 Nov;38(11):633-8.
The internal jugular vein (IJV) is a common access route to the central venous system. Anatomical landmarks (group I) are normally used for localization of the IJV. We have compared this method with two other methods based on ultrasonic waves to identify the IJV and the carotid artery (CA) (even in atypical positions). We employed an ultrasound Doppler device in group II and a real-time ultrasonograph in group III. Central venous catheters were placed into the right IJV by the Seldinger technique. The IJV could be located in all patients with both ultrasound methods, but the course of the IJV could only be identified by ultrasonography. For this reason, the direction of the IJV was classified as "typical" in 80% of group I, in 85% of group II, but in only 45% of group III. No intergroup differences were found with respect to the number of punctures (mean value 1.6 +/- 0.83) and the incidence of complications. The time required to locate the site and direction of puncture increased with technical sophistication. There was, however, no difference in the total time for catheter placement, because puncture was performed faster when aided by sonography. In four patients in groups I and II, in whom attempts to puncture the IJV had not been successful, this could subsequently be achieved with ultrasonographic aid. One patient (group I) displayed a hematoma following inadvertent puncture of the CA. In one patient in group II the IJV and CA could not be distinguished as one was overlying the other. The echocamera provided improved localization of the IJV and the CA in comparison with the Doppler ultrasound.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
颈内静脉(IJV)是进入中心静脉系统的常用途径。解剖标志(第一组)通常用于颈内静脉的定位。我们将这种方法与另外两种基于超声波的方法进行了比较,以识别颈内静脉和颈动脉(CA)(即使在非典型位置)。第二组使用超声多普勒设备,第三组使用实时超声仪。通过Seldinger技术将中心静脉导管置入右侧颈内静脉。两种超声方法在所有患者中都能找到颈内静脉,但只有超声检查才能确定颈内静脉的走行。因此,颈内静脉的走行在第一组80%的患者、第二组85%的患者中被归类为“典型”,但在第三组中只有45%。在穿刺次数(平均值1.6±0.83)和并发症发生率方面未发现组间差异。确定穿刺部位和方向所需的时间随着技术复杂性的增加而增加。然而,导管置入的总时间没有差异,因为在超声引导下穿刺更快。在第一组和第二组中有4例患者,穿刺颈内静脉未成功,但随后在超声辅助下成功完成。一名患者(第一组)在意外穿刺颈动脉后出现血肿。第二组中有一名患者无法区分颈内静脉和颈动脉,因为其中一条覆盖在另一条之上。与多普勒超声相比,超声摄像头能更好地定位颈内静脉和颈动脉。(摘要截短至250字)