Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of South Florida , 4202 E. Fowler Ave., Tampa, Florida 33620, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 5;50(13):6680-9. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05055. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
Energy and resource consumptions required to treat and transport wastewater have led to efforts to improve the environmental sustainability of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Resource recovery can reduce the environmental impact of these systems; however, limited research has considered how the scale of implementation impacts the sustainability of WWTPs integrated with resource recovery. Accordingly, this research uses life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate how the scale of implementation impacts the environmental sustainability of wastewater treatment integrated with water reuse, energy recovery, and nutrient recycling. Three systems were selected: a septic tank with aerobic treatment at the household scale, an advanced water reclamation facility at the community scale, and an advanced water reclamation facility at the city scale. Three sustainability indicators were considered: embodied energy, carbon footprint, and eutrophication potential. This study determined that as with economies of scale, there are benefits to centralization of WWTPs with resource recovery in terms of embodied energy and carbon footprint; however, the community scale was shown to have the lowest eutrophication potential. Additionally, technology selection, nutrient control practices, system layout, and topographical conditions may have a larger impact on environmental sustainability than the implementation scale in some cases.
处理和运输废水所需的能源和资源消耗促使人们努力提高废水处理厂 (WWTP) 的环境可持续性。资源回收可以减少这些系统的环境影响;然而,有限的研究考虑了实施规模如何影响与资源回收相结合的 WWTP 的可持续性。因此,本研究使用生命周期评估 (LCA) 来评估实施规模如何影响与水再利用、能源回收和营养物质回收相结合的废水处理的环境可持续性。选择了三个系统:家庭规模的好氧处理化粪池、社区规模的高级水回收设施和城市规模的高级水回收设施。考虑了三个可持续性指标:体现能源、碳足迹和富营养化潜力。本研究确定,与规模经济一样,资源回收的 WWTP 集中化在体现能源和碳足迹方面具有优势;然而,社区规模显示出最低的富营养化潜力。此外,在某些情况下,技术选择、营养物控制实践、系统布局和地形条件对环境可持续性的影响可能大于实施规模。