Jones Holly P, Holmes Nick D, Butchart Stuart H M, Tershy Bernie R, Kappes Peter J, Corkery Ilse, Aguirre-Muñoz Alfonso, Armstrong Doug P, Bonnaud Elsa, Burbidge Andrew A, Campbell Karl, Courchamp Franck, Cowan Philip E, Cuthbert Richard J, Ebbert Steve, Genovesi Piero, Howald Gregg R, Keitt Bradford S, Kress Stephen W, Miskelly Colin M, Oppel Steffen, Poncet Sally, Rauzon Mark J, Rocamora Gérard, Russell James C, Samaniego-Herrera Araceli, Seddon Philip J, Spatz Dena R, Towns David R, Croll Donald A
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115; Institute for the Study of the Environment, Sustainability, and Energy, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115;
Island Conservation, Santa Cruz, CA 95060;
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 12;113(15):4033-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521179113. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
More than US$21 billion is spent annually on biodiversity conservation. Despite their importance for preventing or slowing extinctions and preserving biodiversity, conservation interventions are rarely assessed systematically for their global impact. Islands house a disproportionately higher amount of biodiversity compared with mainlands, much of which is highly threatened with extinction. Indeed, island species make up nearly two-thirds of recent extinctions. Islands therefore are critical targets of conservation. We used an extensive literature and database review paired with expert interviews to estimate the global benefits of an increasingly used conservation action to stem biodiversity loss: eradication of invasive mammals on islands. We found 236 native terrestrial insular faunal species (596 populations) that benefitted through positive demographic and/or distributional responses from 251 eradications of invasive mammals on 181 islands. Seven native species (eight populations) were negatively impacted by invasive mammal eradication. Four threatened species had their International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List extinction-risk categories reduced as a direct result of invasive mammal eradication, and no species moved to a higher extinction-risk category. We predict that 107 highly threatened birds, mammals, and reptiles on the IUCN Red List-6% of all these highly threatened species-likely have benefitted from invasive mammal eradications on islands. Because monitoring of eradication outcomes is sporadic and limited, the impacts of global eradications are likely greater than we report here. Our results highlight the importance of invasive mammal eradication on islands for protecting the world's most imperiled fauna.
每年在生物多样性保护方面的花费超过210亿美元。尽管保护措施对于预防或减缓物种灭绝以及保护生物多样性至关重要,但很少对其全球影响进行系统评估。与大陆相比,岛屿拥有数量极不成比例的更多生物多样性,其中许多面临着极高的灭绝威胁。事实上,岛屿物种几乎占最近灭绝物种的三分之二。因此,岛屿是保护的关键目标。我们通过广泛的文献和数据库审查并结合专家访谈,来估计一种日益常用的旨在阻止生物多样性丧失的保护行动的全球效益:在岛屿上根除入侵哺乳动物。我们发现,在181个岛屿上进行的251次入侵哺乳动物根除行动,使236种本土陆地岛屿动物物种(596个种群)通过积极的种群动态和/或分布变化而受益。有7种本土物种(8个种群)受到入侵哺乳动物根除行动的负面影响。有4种受威胁物种由于入侵哺乳动物的根除,其在国际自然保护联盟(IUCN)红色名录中的灭绝风险类别直接降低,且没有物种的灭绝风险类别升至更高等级。我们预测,IUCN红色名录上的107种高度濒危鸟类、哺乳动物和爬行动物——占所有这些高度濒危物种的6%——可能已从岛屿上的入侵哺乳动物根除行动中受益。由于对根除结果的监测是零星且有限的,全球根除行动的影响可能比我们在此报告的更大。我们的结果凸显了在岛屿上根除入侵哺乳动物对于保护世界上最濒危动物群的重要性。