Ekim Ayşe Aydemir, İnal Esra Erkol, Gönüllü Emel, Hamarat Hatice, Yorulmaz Göknur, Mumcu Gamze, Yılmazer Şebnem, Kaya Dilek Serin, Kuzgun Selen, Çolak Ertuǧrul, Orhan Hikmet
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Zübeyde Hanım Campus, Eskişehir Public Hospital, Eskişehir, Turkey.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Nov 21;29(4):779-786. doi: 10.3233/BMR-160689.
The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of continuous passive motion (CPM) treatment on adhesive capsulitis (AC) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients.
Forty-one DM patients with AC were randomized to two treatment groups. The first group (n= 20) (CPM group) received CPM treatments; the second group (n= 21) had conventional physical therapy (CPT group), including active stretching, range of motion (ROM) and pendulum exercises. All patients received electrotherapy. After a four-week-long physical therapy program, the patients were instructed to continue with an eight-week home exercise program. The patients rated the pain they felt at night, both while at rest and in motion, in the past week using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Functional outcome evaluations were performed using the Constant Shoulder Score (CSS) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). All patients were evaluated at baseline, and during the fourth and twelfth weeks of the study.
There were significant improvements in both groups' active and passive ROM for the shoulder, VAS measures, SPADI pain and disability scores and CSS, and excluding the active and passive internal and external rotation of shoulder increased with both treatment methods (CPM or CPT) over time (p< 0.001), however these differences were found to be prominent in patients receiving CPM therapy.
Both the CPM and CPT therapies seemed to be beneficial for the treatment of AC in DM patients, however CPM revealed more distinctive improvements in the function and pain levels of the AC patients.
本研究旨在阐明持续被动运动(CPM)治疗对糖尿病(DM)患者粘连性关节囊炎(AC)的影响。
41例患有AC的DM患者被随机分为两个治疗组。第一组(n = 20)(CPM组)接受CPM治疗;第二组(n = 21)进行传统物理治疗(CPT组),包括主动伸展、活动范围(ROM)和钟摆运动。所有患者均接受电疗。经过为期四周的物理治疗方案后,指导患者继续进行为期八周的家庭锻炼计划。患者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对过去一周在休息和活动时夜间感受到的疼痛进行评分。使用Constant肩关节评分(CSS)和肩痛与功能障碍指数(SPADI)进行功能结局评估。在基线以及研究的第四周和第十二周对所有患者进行评估。
两组患者肩部的主动和被动ROM、VAS测量值、SPADI疼痛和功能障碍评分以及CSS均有显著改善,并且随着时间的推移,两种治疗方法(CPM或CPT)使肩部的主动和被动内旋及外旋均增加(p < 0.001),然而,在接受CPM治疗的患者中这些差异更为显著。
CPM和CPT疗法似乎都对DM患者的AC治疗有益,然而CPM在AC患者的功能和疼痛水平方面显示出更显著的改善。