Bian Sumin, Stappen Thomas Van, Baert Filip, Compernolle Griet, Brouwers Els, Tops Sophie, Vries Annick de, Rispens Theo, Lammertyn Jeroen, Vermeire Séverine, Gils Ann
Laboratory for Therapeutic and Diagnostic Antibodies, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016 Jun 5;125:62-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.03.029. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
A number of assays are currently available to support therapeutic drug monitoring of adalimumab. A complete characterization of the assays and comparison of different assays has not been performed. The aim of this study, therefore, is to generate and characterize of a panel of monoclonal antibodies towards adalimumab (MA-ADM); to use this panel to develop novel assays to determine adalimumab concentrations; to assess the impact of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and (non-)neutralizing antibodies on adalimumab detection and to compare the performance of assays. In total, ten specific MA-ADM were generated of which four revealed a neutralizing potency of >78%. At least six different clusters were identified using principal component analysis. MA-ADM40D8 was selected as detecting antibody to determine adalimumab in the TNF-coated ELISA (A) and the MA-ADM28B8/MA-ADM40D8 antibody pair was chosen for use in the MA-coated ELISA (B). The impact of TNF and (non-) neutralizing antibodies was similar in both ELISAs. Finally, serum samples of adalimumab-treated Crohn's disease patients were collected and used for an external validation using the assay of Sanquin (C) and the apDia kit (D). All adalimumab assays showed excellent Pearson correlation: r=0.96 for A versus B, 0.96 for A versus C, 0.94 for A versus D, 0.97 for B versus C, 0.95 for B versus D and 0.94 for C and D. The excellent agreement with the two commercially available ELISAs allows harmonization of treatment algorithms in and between different hospitals/infusion centers.
目前有多种检测方法可用于支持阿达木单抗的治疗药物监测。尚未对这些检测方法进行全面表征以及不同检测方法之间的比较。因此,本研究的目的是制备并表征一组针对阿达木单抗的单克隆抗体(MA-ADM);使用该组单克隆抗体开发新型检测方法以测定阿达木单抗浓度;评估肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)和(非)中和抗体对阿达木单抗检测的影响,并比较各检测方法的性能。总共制备了十种特异性MA-ADM,其中四种显示中和效力>78%。使用主成分分析至少鉴定出六个不同的簇。选择MA-ADM40D8作为检测抗体,用于在TNF包被的ELISA(A)中测定阿达木单抗,选择MA-ADM28B8/MA-ADM40D8抗体对用于MA包被的ELISA(B)。两种ELISA中TNF和(非)中和抗体的影响相似。最后,收集接受阿达木单抗治疗的克罗恩病患者的血清样本,并使用Sanquin检测法(C)和apDia试剂盒(D)进行外部验证。所有阿达木单抗检测方法均显示出极好的皮尔逊相关性:A与B的r = 0.96,A与C的r = 0.96,A与D的r = 0.94,B与C的r = 0.97,B与D的r = 0.95,C与D的r = 0.94。与两种市售ELISA的良好一致性使得不同医院/输液中心内部及之间的治疗算法能够统一。