Suppr超能文献

[药品批准要求及额外益处评估:监管方面与经验]

[Requirements for drug approval and additional benefits assessment: Regulatory aspects and experiences].

作者信息

Broich K, Löbker W, Schulte A, Beinlich P, Müller T

机构信息

Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Kurt-Georg-Kiesinger-Allee 3, 53175, Bonn, Deutschland.

Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss, Berlin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Nervenarzt. 2016 Apr;87(4):376-85. doi: 10.1007/s00115-016-0101-5.

Abstract

The early assessment of benefits of newly approved drugs with novel active substances or new applications, which came into force on 1 January 2011 still represents a challenge to all parties involved. This article highlights the definitions, regulatory requirements and interaction between drug marketing approval and early assessment of benefits in Germany. The constellation of an extensively harmonized European and even international drug authorization process with a predominantly national regulation of drug reimbursement situation inevitably causes friction, which could be markedly reduced through early joint advisory discussions during the planning phase for pivotal clinical trials. During the year 2015 the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) carried out 300 scientific advice procedures of which 34 were concerned with applications in the field of indications for the central nervous system (CNS). In comparison 98 advisory meetings were held by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) of which the BfArM provided advice in 12 instances and in 2 cases on CNS indications. Study design, endpoints and appropriate comparative therapies are the key issues in exchanges and discussions between the BfArM, the G‑BA and applicants. Under these aspects the BfArM and G‑BA promote an early and consistent involvement in early advice procedures regarding the prerequisites for drug approval and assessment of additional benefits.

摘要

2011年1月1日生效的针对具有新型活性物质或新用途的新批准药物的早期效益评估,对所有相关方来说仍是一项挑战。本文重点介绍了德国药品上市许可与早期效益评估之间的定义、监管要求及相互作用。广泛协调的欧洲乃至国际药品授权程序与主要由国家规定的药品报销情况的组合,不可避免地会产生摩擦,而在关键临床试验的规划阶段通过早期联合咨询讨论可显著减少这种摩擦。2015年,联邦药品和医疗器械研究所(BfArM)开展了300次科学咨询程序,其中34次涉及中枢神经系统(CNS)适应症领域的申请。相比之下,联邦联合委员会(G-BA)召开了98次咨询会议,其中BfArM在12个案例中提供了咨询意见,在2个涉及CNS适应症的案例中提供了咨询。研究设计、终点指标和适当的对照疗法是BfArM、G-BA与申请人之间交流和讨论的关键问题。在这些方面,BfArM和G-BA推动尽早并始终如一地参与有关药物批准前提条件和额外效益评估的早期咨询程序。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验