Strzelczyk A, Hamer H M
Epilepsiezentrum Frankfurt Rhein-Main, Klinik für Neurologie, J.W. Goethe Universität, Schleusenweg 2-16, Haus 95, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Epilepsiezentrum Hessen, Klinik für Neurologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
Nervenarzt. 2016 Apr;87(4):386-93. doi: 10.1007/s00115-016-0087-z.
Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases and represents a significant burden for patients, their families and society. In more than 75 % of patients anticonvulsant therapy consists of valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine or levetiracetam. There is a need for polytherapy in drug-refractory patients and they suffer from negative effects on quality of life and employment that is associated with high indirect costs. To allow a comprehensive treatment in this patient group, access to new anticonvulsants with novel modes of action is needed; however, all applications for new antiepileptic drugs failed to prove added benefits during the Pharmaceutical Market Restructuring Act (AMNOG) in Germany. One of the main reasons is the mandatory definition of a standard comparative therapy. It remains unclear whether there will be studies in the future which will fulfill the requirements of the current version of AMNOG. Observational studies after approval and marketing of new antiepileptic drugs could be better alternatives to prove added benefits for individual patients in the current German healthcare system.
癫痫是最常见的慢性神经疾病之一,给患者及其家庭和社会带来了沉重负担。超过75%的患者抗惊厥治疗采用丙戊酸盐、卡马西平、拉莫三嗪或左乙拉西坦。药物难治性患者需要联合治疗,他们的生活质量和就业受到负面影响,间接成本高昂。为了对这一患者群体进行全面治疗,需要获得具有新作用模式的新型抗惊厥药物;然而,在德国《药品市场改革法案》(AMNOG)期间,所有新型抗癫痫药物的申请都未能证明其附加益处。主要原因之一是标准对照治疗的强制定义。目前尚不清楚未来是否会有研究满足当前版本AMNOG的要求。在新型抗癫痫药物获批上市后进行观察性研究,可能是在当前德国医疗体系中证明对个体患者有附加益处的更好选择。