STARD 2015: updated reporting guidelines for all diagnostic accuracy studies.
作者信息
Bossuyt Patrick M, Cohen Jérémie F, Gatsonis Constantine A, Korevaar Daniël A
机构信息
1 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands ; 2 INSERM UMR 1153 and Department of Pediatrics, Necker Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France ; 3 Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
出版信息
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Feb;4(4):85. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2016.02.06.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
STARD 2015: updated reporting guidelines for all diagnostic accuracy studies.《STARD 2015：所有诊断准确性研究的更新报告指南》
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Feb;4(4):85. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2016.02.06.
2
Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD.诊断准确性研究的报告质量：对遵循《诊断准确性研究报告规范》（STARD）情况的调查进行的系统评价和荟萃分析
Evid Based Med. 2014 Apr;19(2):47-54. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101637. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
3
STARD-BLCM: Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies that use Bayesian Latent Class Models.STARD-BLCM：使用贝叶斯潜在类别模型的诊断准确性研究报告标准。
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Mar 1;138:37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
4
Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.生殖医学中检验准确性研究的报告质量：诊断准确性报告标准（STARD）倡议的影响
Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.050. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
5
Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Laboratory Medicine: Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.检验医学中诊断准确性研究报告质量：对诊断准确性研究报告标准（STARD）2015 的遵守情况。
Ann Lab Med. 2020 May;40(3):245-252. doi: 10.3343/alm.2020.40.3.245.
6
The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?自《STARD声明》发布以来诊断准确性研究的质量：有提高吗？
Neurology. 2006 Sep 12;67(5):792-7. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238386.41398.30.
7
Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies on pelvic floor three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: a systematic review.盆腔三维经会阴超声诊断准确性研究报告质量的系统评价。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):451-457. doi: 10.1002/uog.17390.
8
Reporting standards in cardiac MRI, CT, and SPECT diagnostic accuracy studies: analysis of the impact of STARD criteria.心脏 MRI、CT 和 SPECT 诊断准确性研究的报告标准：STARD 标准的影响分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;15(6):691-700. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jet277. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
9
Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.STARD 清单的可重复性：一种评估诊断准确性研究报告质量的工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006 Mar 15;6:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-12.
10
Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015.MRI 亚组成像诊断准确性研究报告：对 STARD 2015 的遵循情况。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Feb;47(2):523-544. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25797. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
引用本文的文献
1
Associations between urinary glycosaminoglycans and onset of acute respiratory distress syndrome in sepsis patients: a prospective exploratory study.脓毒症患者尿糖胺聚糖与急性呼吸窘迫综合征发病之间的关联：一项前瞻性探索性研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 22;15(1):17783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02109-5.
2
Reply: the ups and downs of passive leg raising.回复：被动抬腿试验的上下波动
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Jan 24;13(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00718-y.
3
Head-to-head comparison of pre-hospital qSOFA and lactate-qSOFA for predicting sepsis in patients with and without suspected infection. A multicenter prospective cohort study.院前qSOFA与乳酸-qSOFA在预测有无疑似感染患者脓毒症方面的头对头比较。一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Med Sci. 2020 Feb 12;20(5):1547-1555. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.92901. eCollection 2024.
4
Is passive leg raising clinically useful in predicting intradialytic hypotension?被动抬腿试验在预测透析中低血压方面在临床上有用吗？
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2024 Nov 19;12(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s40635-024-00683-y.
5
LIPS and PaO/FiO Combined Plasma Biomarkers Predict Onset of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients of High Risks in SICU: A Prospective Exploratory Study.LIPS 和 PaO/FiO 联合血浆生物标志物预测 SICU 高危患者急性呼吸窘迫综合征的发生：一项前瞻性探索性研究。
Mediators Inflamm. 2024 Sep 17;2024:4936265. doi: 10.1155/2024/4936265. eCollection 2024.
6
Evaluation of C-Reactive Protein and Computer-Aided Analysis of Chest X-rays as Tuberculosis Triage Tests at Health Facilities in Lesotho and South Africa.评价 C 反应蛋白和计算机辅助分析胸部 X 光在莱索托和南非医疗机构中的结核病分诊检测作用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 22;79(5):1293-1302. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae378.
7
Evaluation of the SsIR/NIE recombinant antigen ELISA for the follow up of patients infected by : a diagnostic study.评估 SsIR/NIE 重组抗原 ELISA 对感染 : 的患者进行随访的效果——一项诊断研究。
Parasitology. 2024 Mar;151(3):295-299. doi: 10.1017/S0031182024000027. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
8
O-RADS Classification for Ultrasound Assessment of Adnexal Masses: Agreement between IOTA Lexicon and ADNEX Model for Assigning Risk Group.附件包块超声评估的O-RADS分类：IOTA词汇表与ADNEX模型在风险分组判定上的一致性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 10;13(4):673. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13040673.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection by canine olfaction.犬嗅觉检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断准确性。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 1;17(6):e0268382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268382. eCollection 2022.
10
Optimising diagnostics to discriminate complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis: a prospective cohort study protocol.优化诊断以区分复杂性和非复杂性阑尾炎：一项前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):e054304. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054304.
本文引用的文献
1
STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies.STARD 2015：诊断准确性研究报告的必备项目更新清单。
Clin Chem. 2015 Dec;61(12):1446-52. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.246280. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
2
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.减少生物医学研究中不完整或无法使用的报告所造成的浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):267-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
3
Diagnostic accuracy reporting guidelines should prescribe reporting, not modeling.诊断准确性报告指南应规定报告内容，而非建模方法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):355-6; discussion 362-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.11.002.
Zotero 插件