心理健康危机解决团队的核心服务改进计划:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
The CORE Service Improvement Programme for mental health crisis resolution teams: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.
作者信息
Lloyd-Evans Brynmor, Fullarton Kate, Lamb Danielle, Johnston Elaine, Onyett Steve, Osborn David, Ambler Gareth, Marston Louise, Hunter Rachael, Mason Oliver, Henderson Claire, Goater Nicky, Sullivan Sarah A, Kelly Kathleen, Gray Richard, Nolan Fiona, Pilling Stephen, Bond Gary, Johnson Sonia
机构信息
Division of Psychiatry, UCL, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Onyett Entero Ltd, Care of University of the West of England, Health and Life Sciences Coldharbour Ln, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.
出版信息
Trials. 2016 Mar 22;17:158. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1283-7.
BACKGROUND
As an alternative to hospital admission, crisis resolution teams (CRTs) provide intensive home treatment to people experiencing mental health crises. Trial evidence supports the effectiveness of the CRT model, but research suggests that the anticipated reductions in inpatient admissions and increased user satisfaction with acute care have been less than hoped for following the scaling up of CRTs nationally in England, as mandated by the National Health Service (NHS) Plan in 2000. The organisation and service delivery of the CRTs vary substantially. This may reflect the lack of a fully specified CRT model and the resources to enhance team model fidelity and to improve service quality. We will evaluate the impact of a CRT service improvement programme over a 1-year period on the service users' experiences of care, service use, staff well-being, and team model fidelity.
METHODS/DESIGN: Twenty-five CRTs from eight NHS Trusts across England will be recruited to this cluster-randomised trial: 15 CRTs will be randomised to receive the service improvement programme over a 1-year period, and ten CRTs will not receive the programme. Data will be collected from 15 service users and all clinical staff from each participating CRT at baseline and at the end of the intervention. Service use data will be collected from the services' electronic records systems for two 6-month periods: the period preceding and the period during months 7-12 of the intervention. The study's primary outcome is service user satisfaction with CRT care, measured using a client satisfaction questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include the following: perceived continuity of care, hospital admission rates and bed use, rates of readmission to acute care following CRT support, staff morale, job satisfaction, and general health. The adherence of the services to a model of best practice will be assessed at baseline and follow-up. Outcomes will be compared between the intervention and control teams, adjusting for baseline differences and participant characteristics using linear random effects modelling. Qualitative investigations with participating CRT managers and staff and programme facilitators will explore the experiences of the service improvement programme.
DISCUSSION
Our trial will show whether a theoretically underpinned and clearly defined package of resources are effective in supporting service improvement and improving outcomes for mental health crisis resolution teams.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47185233.
背景
作为住院治疗的替代方案,危机解决团队(CRT)为经历心理健康危机的人提供强化居家治疗。试验证据支持CRT模式的有效性,但研究表明,自2000年《国民健康服务(NHS)计划》要求在英国全国范围内扩大CRT规模以来,预期的住院人数减少以及用户对急性护理满意度的提高并未达到预期。CRT的组织和服务提供差异很大。这可能反映出缺乏一个完全明确的CRT模式以及用于提高团队模式保真度和改善服务质量的资源。我们将评估一项为期1年的CRT服务改进计划对服务使用者的护理体验、服务使用情况、工作人员幸福感以及团队模式保真度的影响。
方法/设计:将从英格兰八个NHS信托机构招募25个CRT参与这项整群随机试验:15个CRT将被随机分配接受为期1年的服务改进计划,10个CRT将不接受该计划。将在基线期和干预结束时从每个参与的CRT的15名服务使用者和所有临床工作人员收集数据。将从服务的电子记录系统收集两个6个月期间的服务使用数据:干预前的6个月期间以及干预第7至12个月期间。该研究的主要结局是使用客户满意度问卷衡量的服务使用者对CRT护理的满意度。次要结局包括以下方面:感知到的护理连续性、住院率和床位使用情况、在CRT支持后再次入住急性护理的比率、工作人员士气、工作满意度和总体健康状况。将在基线期和随访时评估服务对最佳实践模式的依从性。将使用线性随机效应模型在干预组和对照组之间比较结局,并对基线差异和参与者特征进行调整。对参与的CRT经理、工作人员和项目促进者进行定性调查,将探索服务改进计划的体验。
讨论
我们的试验将表明,一套理论基础扎实且明确界定的资源包是否能有效支持服务改进并改善心理健康危机解决团队的结局。
试验注册
当前受控试验ISRCTN47185233。