Suppr超能文献

我该留下还是离开?关于影响医学生留学项目决策因素的系统评价

Should I stay or should I go? A systematic review of factors that influence healthcare students' decisions around study abroad programmes.

作者信息

Brown Mary, Boateng Edward Appiah, Evans Catrin

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK.

School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK; Department of Nursing, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Apr;39:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.024. Epub 2016 Jan 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Study abroad programmes have been shown to have significant benefits for participating healthcare students such as promoting cultural awareness and understanding of different healthcare settings, policies and practices. Healthcare students are encouraged to undertake elective or Erasmus placements overseas to enhance personal and professional development and to broaden horizons through lived cultural experience. However, there is a relatively low uptake of such opportunities amongst this student group.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to explore factors that influence healthcare students' decision making around study abroad opportunities within undergraduate training programmes.

REVIEW DESIGN METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken utilising a narrative synthesis approach.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ASSIA, and ERIC databases. Key institutions were contacted for grey literature. Studies that reported on factors that influence healthcare students' decisions regarding study abroad programmes were included in the review.

RESULTS

Ten studies were identified for inclusion (5 qualitative studies, 5 surveys), indicating a paucity of research in this area. Data synthesis indicates that factors that influence healthcare students' decisions to participate in study abroad programmes are similar across different geographic locations and different professional groups. Factors that support decisions to study overseas include having sufficient information about study abroad programmes, especially early in an academic programme, having an interest in other cultures/countries and having academic staff and family as positive role models who motivate them to study abroad. Key barriers are cost and language issues. Language remains a significant barrier even when generous bursaries are available, as with the Erasmus scheme, when students are not proficient with the language spoken in host countries. Students tend to prefer destinations where language is not a problem or where countries have cultural or historical connections, such as being part of the Commonwealth countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Promotion of study abroad opportunities needs to start early in an academic programme. It should include detailed information and provision of language support. Faculty have an important part to play as enthusiastic role models.

摘要

背景

事实表明,海外学习项目对参与其中的医科学生有显著益处,比如能提升文化意识,增进对不同医疗环境、政策及实践的理解。鼓励医科学生在海外进行选修课程学习或参与伊拉斯谟计划实习,以促进个人和职业发展,并通过亲身文化体验拓宽视野。然而,这一学生群体对这类机会的参与度相对较低。

目的

本系统评价旨在探究影响医科学生在本科培训项目中围绕海外学习机会做出决策的因素。

综述设计方法

采用叙述性综合方法进行系统评价。

数据来源

对MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、PsycINFO、ASSIA和ERIC数据库进行了全面的文献检索。联系了主要机构以获取灰色文献。纳入综述的研究需报告影响医科学生关于海外学习项目决策的因素。

结果

共确定10项研究纳入(5项定性研究,5项调查),表明该领域研究匮乏。数据综合分析表明,影响医科学生参与海外学习项目决策的因素在不同地理位置和不同专业群体中相似。支持海外学习决策的因素包括对海外学习项目有足够的信息,尤其是在学术项目早期,对其他文化/国家感兴趣,以及有学术人员和家人作为积极的榜样激励他们出国留学。关键障碍是成本和语言问题。即使有慷慨的助学金,如伊拉斯谟计划,当学生对东道国语言不熟练时,语言仍是一个重大障碍。学生倾向于选择语言不是问题的目的地,或者选择有文化或历史联系的国家,比如英联邦国家。

结论

海外学习机会的推广需在学术项目早期就开始。应包括详细信息并提供语言支持。教师作为热情的榜样发挥着重要作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验