Acosta Ramírez Naydú, Giovanella Ligia, Vega Romero Roman, Tejerina Silva Herland, de Almeida Patty Fidelis, Ríos Gilberto, Goede Hedwig, Oliveira Suelen
Department of Public Health, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Cali, Colombia,
Department of Administration and Planning in Health, National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fam Pract. 2016 Jun;33(3):261-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw013. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
Primary health care (PHC) renewal processes are currently ongoing in South America (SA), but their characteristics have not been systematically described.
The study aimed to describe and contrast the PHC approaches being implemented in SA to provide knowledge of current conceptions, models and challenges.
This multiple case study used a qualitative approach with technical visits to health ministries in order to apply key-informant interviews of 129 PHC national policy makers and 53 local managers, as well as field observation of 57 selected PHC providers and document analysis, using a common matrix for data collection and analysis. PHC approaches were analysed by triangulating sources using the following categories: PHC philosophy and conception, service provision organization, intersectoral collaboration and social participation.
Primary health care models were identified in association with existing health system types and the dynamics of PHC renewal in each country. A neo-selective model was found in three countries where coverage is segmented by private and public regimes; here, individual and collective care are separated. A comprehensive approach similar to the Alma-Ata model was found in seven countries where the public sector predominates and individual, family and community care are coordinated under the responsibility of the same health care team.
The process of implementing a renewed PHC approach is affected by how health systems are funded and organized. Both models face many obstacles. In addition, care system organization, intersectoral coordination and social participation are weak in most of the countries.
南美洲目前正在进行初级卫生保健(PHC)的更新进程,但其特点尚未得到系统描述。
本研究旨在描述和对比南美洲正在实施的初级卫生保健方法,以提供有关当前理念、模式和挑战的知识。
本多案例研究采用定性方法,对各国卫生部进行技术访问,以便对129名初级卫生保健国家政策制定者和53名地方管理人员进行关键信息访谈,并对57名选定的初级卫生保健提供者进行实地观察以及文件分析,使用通用矩阵进行数据收集和分析。通过对以下类别来源进行三角测量来分析初级卫生保健方法:初级卫生保健理念和概念、服务提供组织、部门间合作和社会参与。
确定了与现有卫生系统类型以及各国初级卫生保健更新动态相关的初级卫生保健模式。在三个国家发现了一种新选择性模式,其覆盖范围按私营和公共制度划分;在此,个人护理和集体护理是分开的。在七个国家发现了一种类似于阿拉木图模式的综合方法,这些国家以公共部门为主导,个人、家庭和社区护理在同一卫生保健团队的责任下进行协调。
实施更新后的初级卫生保健方法的过程受到卫生系统筹资和组织方式的影响。两种模式都面临许多障碍。此外,大多数国家的护理系统组织、部门间协调和社会参与都很薄弱。