• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义学是否会受到错过关键期的影响?来自波斯聋人群体的证据。

Is Semantics Affected by Missing a Critical Period? Evidence from the Persian Deaf.

作者信息

Choubsaz Yassaman, Gheitury Amer

机构信息

English Department, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University of Kermanshah, Bagh-e-Abrisham Ave., Kermanshah, Iran.

出版信息

J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):77-88. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9421-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10936-016-9421-7
PMID:27007472
Abstract

The present study aims to explore the semantic knowledge of a group of Iranian deaf individuals who, due mainly to auditory deprivation did not acquire language normally in early years of their life. The participants were ten deaf and a matched number of hearing individuals as control group. A test of five tasks was administrated to assess their knowledge of vocabulary, collocation, semantic categorizations, semantic features, and proverbs. Although the results indicated a significant difference between the deaf and the hearing group, a between- group comparison of each task revealed no significant difference between the deaf and hearing participants in the number of errors in vocabulary, collocations, semantic categorization, and semantic features. The only task in which deaf participants did significantly worse than the control group was that of proverbs. Therefore, it could be argued that, language deprivation in early childhood does not have the same effect on different components of our linguistic knowledge and that the acquisition of semantics may well continue beyond puberty.

摘要

本研究旨在探索一群伊朗聋人的语义知识,这些聋人主要由于听觉剥夺,在其早年未能正常习得语言。参与者为十名聋人以及数量与之匹配的听力正常个体作为对照组。进行了一项包含五项任务的测试,以评估他们在词汇、搭配、语义分类、语义特征和谚语方面的知识。尽管结果表明聋人群体和听力正常群体之间存在显著差异,但对每项任务的组间比较显示,聋人和听力正常参与者在词汇、搭配、语义分类和语义特征方面的错误数量没有显著差异。聋人参与者表现明显比对照组差的唯一任务是谚语任务。因此,可以认为,幼儿期的语言剥夺对我们语言知识的不同组成部分不会产生相同的影响,并且语义的习得很可能在青春期之后仍会继续。

相似文献

1
Is Semantics Affected by Missing a Critical Period? Evidence from the Persian Deaf.语义学是否会受到错过关键期的影响?来自波斯聋人群体的证据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):77-88. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9421-7.
2
Semantic fluency in deaf children who use spoken and signed language in comparison with hearing peers.与听力正常的同龄人相比,使用口语和手语的聋儿的语义流畅性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 Jan;53(1):157-170. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12333. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
3
Disentangling Linguistic Modality Effects in Semantic Processing.解析语义处理中的语言模态效应
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Apr;46(2):311-328. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9439-x.
4
Semantic categorization: a comparison between deaf and hearing children.语义分类:聋童与听力正常儿童的比较
J Commun Disord. 2010 Sep-Oct;43(5):347-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
5
Lateralization effects during semantic and rhyme judgement tasks in deaf and hearing subjects.聋人和听力正常受试者在语义和韵律判断任务中的偏侧化效应。
Brain Lang. 2003 Nov;87(2):227-40. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00104-4.
6
Auditory Deprivation Does Not Impair Executive Function, But Language Deprivation Might: Evidence From a Parent-Report Measure in Deaf Native Signing Children.听觉剥夺不会损害执行功能,但语言剥夺可能会:来自对失聪的本土手语儿童进行的家长报告测量的证据。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2017 Jan;22(1):9-21. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enw054. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
7
Early language exposure affects neural mechanisms of semantic representations.早期语言接触影响语义表征的神经机制。
Elife. 2023 May 10;12:e81681. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81681.
8
Generation of Signs Within Semantic and Phonological Categories: Data from Deaf Adults and Children Who Use American Sign Language.语义和语音类别中手语的生成:来自使用美国手语的成年和儿童聋人的数据。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2017 Apr 1;22(2):219-232. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enw075.
9
The effects on auditory and linguistic deprivation of lateral preference of deaf children.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1983 Apr;25(2):207-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1983.tb13745.x.
10
Differential activity in Heschl's gyrus between deaf and hearing individuals is due to auditory deprivation rather than language modality.聋人与听力正常者之间在颞横回的活动差异是由于听觉剥夺而非语言形式所致。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.073. Epub 2015 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Early language exposure affects neural mechanisms of semantic representations.早期语言接触影响语义表征的神经机制。
Elife. 2023 May 10;12:e81681. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81681.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating deaf students' knowledge of Persian syntax: further evidence for a critical period hypothesis.
Neurocase. 2014 Jun;20(3):346-54. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2013.791858. Epub 2013 May 16.
2
Semantic categorization: a comparison between deaf and hearing children.语义分类:聋童与听力正常儿童的比较
J Commun Disord. 2010 Sep-Oct;43(5):347-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
3
What's in a name? Typicality and relatedness effects in children.名字里有什么?儿童的典型性和关联性效应。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 Sep;92(1):46-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.04.001.
4
Does sign language provide deaf children with an abstraction advantage? Evidence from a categorization task.手语是否为失聪儿童提供了抽象优势?来自一项分类任务的证据。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 1997 Summer;2(3):161-71. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014322.
5
Organization and use of the mental lexicon by deaf and hearing individuals.聋人和听力正常者对心理词汇的组织与运用。
Am Ann Deaf. 2004 Spring;149(1):51-61. doi: 10.1353/aad.2004.0013.
6
Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?特定阅读障碍(诵读困难):在过去四十年里我们学到了什么?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;45(1):2-40. doi: 10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x.
7
Age constraints on first versus second language acquisition: evidence for linguistic plasticity and epigenesis.第一语言与第二语言习得的年龄限制:语言可塑性和后生说的证据。
Brain Lang. 2003 Dec;87(3):369-84. doi: 10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00137-8.
8
Semantic and phonological coding in poor and normal readers.阅读能力较差者与正常阅读者的语义和语音编码
J Exp Child Psychol. 1995 Feb;59(1):76-123. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1995.1004.