Hoogeveen Reinier C, Hazenoot Bart, Sanderink Gerard C H, Berkhout W Erwin R
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(5):20150407. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20150407. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
To evaluate the utility of the application of a thyroid shield in intraoral radiography when using rectangular collimation.
Experimental data were obtained by measuring the absorbed dose at the position of the thyroid gland in a RANDO(®) (The Phantom Laboratory, Salem, NY) male phantom with a dosemeter. Four protocols were tested: round collimation and rectangular collimation, both with and without thyroid shield. Five exposure positions were deployed: upper incisor (Isup), upper canine (Csup), upper premolar (Psup), upper molar (Msup) and posterior bitewing (BW). Exposures were made with 70 kV and 7 mA and were repeated 10 times. The exposure times were as recommended for the exposure positions for the respective collimator type by the manufacturer for digital imaging. The data were statistically analyzed with a three-way ANOVA test. Significance was set at p < 0.01.
The ANOVA test revealed that the differences between mean doses of all protocols and geometries were statistically significant, p < 0.001. For the Isup, thyroid dose levels were comparable with both collimators at a level indicating primary beam exposure. Thyroid shield reduced this dose with circa 75%. For the Csup position, round collimation also revealed primary beam exposure, and thyroid shield yield was 70%. In Csup with rectangular collimation, the thyroid dose was reduced with a factor 4 compared with round collimation and thyroid shield yielded an additional 42% dose reduction. The thyroid dose levels for the Csup, Psup, Msup and BW exposures were lower with rectangular collimation without thyroid shield than with round collimation with thyroid shield. With rectangular collimation, the thyroid shield in Psup, Msup and BW reduced the dose 10% or less, where dose levels were already low, implying no clinical significance.
For the exposures in the upper anterior region, thyroid shield results in an important dose reduction for the thyroid. For the other exposures, thyroid shield augments little to the reduction achieved by rectangular collimation. The use of thyroid shield is to be advised, when performing upper anterior radiography.
评估在使用矩形准直器进行口腔内放射摄影时甲状腺防护装置的应用效果。
通过使用剂量仪在RANDO®(幻影实验室,纽约州塞勒姆)男性体模的甲状腺位置测量吸收剂量来获取实验数据。测试了四种方案:圆形准直和矩形准直,均使用和不使用甲状腺防护装置。设置了五个曝光位置:上切牙(Isup)、上尖牙(Csup)、上前磨牙(Psup)、上磨牙(Msup)和后牙合翼片(BW)。使用70 kV和7 mA进行曝光,并重复10次。曝光时间按照制造商针对数字成像的相应准直器类型的曝光位置建议进行设置。数据采用三因素方差分析进行统计分析。显著性设定为p < 0.01。
方差分析显示,所有方案和几何形状的平均剂量之间的差异具有统计学显著性,p < 0.001。对于Isup,两种准直器的甲状腺剂量水平在表明原发射线照射的水平上相当。甲状腺防护装置使该剂量降低了约75%。对于Csup位置,圆形准直也显示出原发射线照射,甲状腺防护装置的防护效果为70%。在矩形准直的Csup位置,与圆形准直相比,甲状腺剂量降低了4倍,甲状腺防护装置使剂量额外降低了42%。在不使用甲状腺防护装置的矩形准直下,Csup、Psup、Msup和BW曝光的甲状腺剂量水平低于使用甲状腺防护装置的圆形准直。在矩形准直下,Psup、Msup和BW的甲状腺防护装置使剂量降低了10%或更少,而此时剂量水平已经很低,这意味着没有临床意义。
对于上前部区域的曝光,甲状腺防护装置可显著降低甲状腺的剂量。对于其他曝光,甲状腺防护装置对矩形准直所实现的剂量降低作用不大。在进行上前部放射摄影时,建议使用甲状腺防护装置。