1 Department of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery, Faculty of Health, University Witten/Herdecke, Hospital Dortmund , Witten/Herdecke , Germany.
2 Digital Diagnostic Center Ltd , Freiburg im Breisgau , Germany.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 Feb;47(3):20160410. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20160410. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
The present study aims at investigating different radiation protection issues and dose values while acquiring intraoral images with a handheld X-ray device.
An Aribex NOMAD Pro 2™, a RANDO male head phantom, a consistency testing body, a PTW NOMEX Multimeter, and a PTW Farmer Ionization Chamber Type 30,010 were used to investigate: (1) dose area products; (2) the expansion of the control area (CA); (3) the scattering pattern and (4) the potential risk for operators of the X-ray device.
Dose area products at different exposure times were distributed linearly with a high correlation factor (>0.9). At 4000 simulated exposures, the greatest extent of the CA was 42 cm (mean = 16.7 cm, SD = 10.8 cm). The highest occurrence of scattering radiation resulted between the RANDO phantom and the X-ray device. No scattered radiation was measured at the dorsal part of the phantom or on the operator site of a virtual vertical plane through the focal spot of the X-ray.
Through this study, we could demonstrate that the application of an Aribex NOMAD Pro 2 device for intraoral imaging does not increase the risk for the operator if the device is controlled according to the manufacturer's specifications. Furthermore, we were able to show that the CA was significantly smaller than specified by European and other international radiation protection standards.
本研究旨在调查使用手持 X 射线设备获取口腔内图像时的不同辐射防护问题和剂量值。
使用 Aribex NOMAD Pro 2™、RANDO 男性头部体模、一致性测试体、PTW NOMEX 多电表和 PTW Farmer 电离室型 30,010 来研究:(1)剂量面积产物;(2)控制区域(CA)的扩展;(3)散射模式;(4)X 射线设备操作人员的潜在风险。
不同曝光时间的剂量面积产物呈线性分布,相关系数高(>0.9)。在 4000 次模拟曝光中,CA 的最大程度为 42cm(平均值=16.7cm,标准差=10.8cm)。RANDO 体模和 X 射线设备之间的散射辐射发生率最高。在体模的背面或虚拟垂直平面上通过 X 射线的焦点的操作人员位置没有测量到散射辐射。
通过这项研究,我们可以证明,如果按照制造商的规格控制 Aribex NOMAD Pro 2 设备的应用,则不会增加操作人员的风险。此外,我们能够表明 CA 明显小于欧洲和其他国际辐射防护标准所规定的范围。