Saunders David H, Sanderson Mark, Hayes Sara, Kilrane Maeve, Greig Carolyn A, Brazzelli Miriam, Mead Gillian E
Moray House School of Education, Institute for Sport, Physical Education and Health Sciences (SPEHS), University of Edinburgh, St Leonards Land, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK, EH8 2AZ.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 24;3(3):CD003316. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003316.pub6.
Levels of physical fitness are low after stroke. It is unknown whether improving physical fitness after stroke reduces disability.
To determine whether fitness training after stroke reduces death, dependence, and disability and to assess the effects of training with regard to adverse events, risk factors, physical fitness, mobility, physical function, quality of life, mood, and cognitive function. Interventions to improve cognitive function have attracted increased attention after being identified as the highest rated research priority for life after stroke. Therefore we have added this class of outcomes to this updated review.
We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched February 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 1: searched February 2015), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2015), EMBASE (1980 to February 2015), CINAHL (1982 to February 2015), SPORTDiscus (1949 to February 2015), and five additional databases (February 2015). We also searched ongoing trials registers, handsearched relevant journals and conference proceedings, screened reference lists, and contacted experts in the field.
Randomised trials comparing either cardiorespiratory training or resistance training, or both (mixed training), with usual care, no intervention, or a non-exercise intervention in stroke survivors.
Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed quality and risk of bias, and extracted data. We analysed data using random-effects meta-analyses. Diverse outcome measures limited the intended analyses.
We included 58 trials, involving 2797 participants, which comprised cardiorespiratory interventions (28 trials, 1408 participants), resistance interventions (13 trials, 432 participants), and mixed training interventions (17 trials, 957 participants). Thirteen deaths occurred before the end of the intervention and a further nine before the end of follow-up. No dependence data were reported. Diverse outcome measures restricted pooling of data. Global indices of disability show moderate improvement after cardiorespiratory training (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19 to 0.84; P value = 0.002) and by a small amount after mixed training (SMD 0.26, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.49; P value = 0.02); benefits at follow-up (i.e. after training had stopped) were unclear. There were too few data to assess the effects of resistance training.Cardiorespiratory training involving walking improved maximum walking speed (mean difference (MD) 6.71 metres per minute, 95% CI 2.73 to 10.69), preferred gait speed (MD 4.28 metres per minute, 95% CI 1.71 to 6.84), and walking capacity (MD 30.29 metres in six minutes, 95% CI 16.19 to 44.39) at the end of the intervention. Mixed training, involving walking, increased preferred walking speed (MD 4.54 metres per minute, 95% CI 0.95 to 8.14), and walking capacity (MD 41.60 metres per six minutes, 95% CI 25.25 to 57.95). Balance scores improved slightly after mixed training (SMD 0.27, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.47). Some mobility benefits also persisted at the end of follow-up. The variability, quality of the included trials, and lack of data prevents conclusions about other outcomes and limits generalisability of the observed results.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Cardiorespiratory training and, to a lesser extent, mixed training reduce disability during or after usual stroke care; this could be mediated by improved mobility and balance. There is sufficient evidence to incorporate cardiorespiratory and mixed training, involving walking, within post-stroke rehabilitation programmes to improve the speed and tolerance of walking; some improvement in balance could also occur. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of resistance training. The effects of training on death and dependence after stroke are still unclear but these outcomes are rarely observed in physical fitness training trials. Cognitive function is under-investigated despite being a key outcome of interest for patients. Further well-designed randomised trials are needed to determine the optimal exercise prescription and identify long-term benefits.
中风后身体机能水平较低。目前尚不清楚中风后改善身体机能是否能减少残疾。
确定中风后的体能训练是否能降低死亡率、依赖性和残疾程度,并评估训练在不良事件、风险因素、体能、活动能力、身体功能、生活质量、情绪和认知功能方面的效果。改善认知功能的干预措施在被确定为中风后生活的最高评级研究重点后,受到了越来越多的关注。因此,我们在本次更新的综述中增加了这类结果。
我们检索了Cochrane中风小组试验注册库(最后检索时间为2015年2月)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL 2015年第1期:检索时间为2015年2月)、MEDLINE(1966年至2015年2月)、EMBASE(1980年至2015年2月)、CINAHL(1982年至2015年2月)、SPORTDiscus(1949年至2015年2月)以及另外五个数据库(2015年2月)。我们还检索了正在进行的试验注册库,手工检索了相关期刊和会议论文集,筛选了参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的专家。
比较中风幸存者进行心肺训练或阻力训练,或两者结合(混合训练)与常规护理、无干预或非运动干预的随机试验。
两位综述作者独立选择试验,评估质量和偏倚风险,并提取数据。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析来分析数据。多样的结局测量方法限制了预期的分析。
我们纳入了58项试验,涉及2797名参与者,其中包括心肺干预试验(28项试验,1408名参与者)、阻力干预试验(13项试验,432名参与者)和混合训练干预试验(17项试验,957名参与者)。在干预结束前有13例死亡,在随访结束前又有9例死亡。未报告依赖性数据。多样的结局测量方法限制了数据的合并。全球残疾指数显示,心肺训练后有中度改善(标准化均数差(SMD)0.52,95%置信区间(CI)0.19至0.84;P值 = 0.002),混合训练后有少量改善(SMD 0.26,95%CI 0.04至0.49;P值 = 0.02);随访时(即训练停止后)的益处尚不清楚。评估阻力训练效果的数据太少。涉及步行的心肺训练在干预结束时提高了最大步行速度(均数差(MD)6.71米/分钟,95%CI 2.73至10.69)、偏好步态速度(MD 4.28米/分钟,95%CI 1.71至6.84)和步行能力(六分钟内步行距离MD 30.29米,95%CI 16.19至44.39)。涉及步行的混合训练提高了偏好步行速度(MD 4.54米/分钟,95%CI 0.95至8.14)和步行能力(每六分钟步行距离MD 41.60米,95%CI 25.25至57.95)。混合训练后平衡得分略有改善(SMD 0.27,95%CI 0.07至0.47)。一些活动能力益处在随访结束时也持续存在。纳入试验的变异性、质量以及数据的缺乏妨碍了对其他结局的结论得出,并限制了观察结果的普遍性。
心肺训练以及程度较轻的混合训练可降低中风常规护理期间或之后的残疾程度;这可能是通过改善活动能力和平衡来介导的。有足够的证据将涉及步行的心肺训练和混合训练纳入中风后康复计划,以提高步行速度和耐力;平衡也可能会有一些改善。没有足够的证据支持使用阻力训练。训练对中风后死亡和依赖性的影响仍不清楚,但这些结局在体能训练试验中很少观察到。尽管认知功能是患者关注的关键结局,但研究不足。需要进一步设计良好的随机试验来确定最佳运动处方并确定长期益处。